Development policies on rural peripheral areas in Visegrad countries: a comparative policy analysis

Abstract

Abstract:The main aim of this paper is to provide a comparative analysis of regional policies dealing with peripheral rural areas in the Visegrad countries from a historical perspective. As it is demonstrated in the paper despite the common political and ideological framework the goals and means of regional policy remained rather different in these countries during state-socialism. The systemic changes demanded the re-conceptualisation of regional development policy and the reconfiguration of the institutional background. As the comparative policy analysis showed in the early 1990s there was a lack of coherent regional policy that would efficiently mitigate growing regional disparities or foster regional competitiveness. The conceptual, legal and institutional foundation of the new regional policy took place in the second half of the 1990s, with some time lag among the countries. In the formulation of strategic documents regarding regional policy the foreseen EU accession played a very important role. The preparation of national development plans were based on the EU's standardized development handbooks, therefore a considerable similarity among the new member states' regional policy documents can be observed. One can say that earlier differences in regional development priorities were gradually eliminated by the European integration among the new member states. However, rural areas were considered in regional economic development policies only in the context of agriculture and tourism development. In addition to local infrastructural development, preservation of natural and cultural heritage, job creation only agriculture and tourism were defined for EU and national subsidies.

Moravian–Slovak Borderland: Possibilities for Rural Development

“…Michalska-Żyła and Marks-Krzyszkowska [7] assumed that economic development and the development of quality of life cannot be equated. The policy of the European Union-although formally forcing multifunctional rural development-is focused primarily on the support of agriculture and tourism [8], which more or less corresponds to the traditional focus. It is to be feared that the more modern conception is hindered mainly by the lobbyist interests of agricultural entrepreneurs.…”

Accuracy assessment and classification efficiency of object-based image analysis of aerial imagery

“…Growth of the socio-economic development along the rural-urban concentric gradients in Poland (2) is mentioned by Barjak (2001), Domański (2003), Ferry (2004), Lobatch (2004), Stryjakiewicz (2009), Churski (2010), Churski, Borowczak (2015) or Kovács et al (2015). Dolata, Borowczak (2014) found that in the western part of Poland these gradients are less pronounced than in the eastern part.…”

Caracterización de la agricultura y desarrollo rural de Eslovaquia

“…Al separarse de la República Checa, Eslovaquia experimentó cambios políticos, económicos (privatizaciones) y sociales profundos, en donde las áreas rurales no lograron hacer frente a la flexibilidad de los mercados y los sectores agrícolas disminuyeron rápidamente. Al final de los años noventa, Eslovaquia comenzó a adoptar nuevas medidas de política con miras a integrar su economía a la UE (Kovács et al, 2015).…”

“…Eslovaquia se hizo acreedor de los apoyos financieros de la UE para impulsar su economía. Actualmente, se aplica el Programa de Desarrollo Rural 2013-2020, los pilares que se promueven son: competitividad de la agricultura, procesamiento de alimentos y de madera, explotación sustentable de los recursos naturales y medioambiente y desarrollo territorial balanceado de la economía rural (Kovács et al, 2015). El término "rural" se entiende por una densidad de población baja, preponderancia de la actividad agraria, fuerte correspondencia entre los habitantes y el medio natural y fuertes relaciones sociales entre sus habitantes (Sancho y Reinoso, 2012).…”