40th International Conference on Environmental Systems 2010
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-6060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development status of a Low-Power CO2 Removal and Compression System for Closed-Loop Air Revitalization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the CDRA is capable of lowering the concentration of the harmful gas to c.a. 5300 ppm (12,13), clinical studies suggest that the spacecraft maximum allowable concentration (SMAC) of CO 2 should be reduced to 2500 ppm or lower, as for future long-duration (>1000 days) space missions current SMACs may still present undesired physiological effects in the crew (14,15).…”
Section: Removal Of Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the CDRA is capable of lowering the concentration of the harmful gas to c.a. 5300 ppm (12,13), clinical studies suggest that the spacecraft maximum allowable concentration (SMAC) of CO 2 should be reduced to 2500 ppm or lower, as for future long-duration (>1000 days) space missions current SMACs may still present undesired physiological effects in the crew (14,15).…”
Section: Removal Of Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, breakthrough curves for CO 2 in dry nitrogen (synthetic air) at concentrations of c.a. 5300 and 2500 ppm are presented since those are the working parameters of the CDRA unit (12) and the under-development Low Power CO 2 Removal (LPCOR) system, respectively (13,24). CO 2 concentrations of 1000 ppm were also tested since it is in the low partial pressures that the Sr 2+ -SAPO-34 was shown to be significantly superior to the currently used 5A Zeolite.…”
Section: Removal Of Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only removal of CO2 at extremely dilute conditions has been already shown elsewhere as being viable for many adsorption materials [22][23][24][25][26]. CO2 removal technologies such as the air revitalization system in the International Space Station [27] or CO2 separation in commercial cryogenic air separation units [28] have worked for years. The real technological challenge is not to separate CO2 from air but concentrate and compress that amount of CO2 at the specifications dictated by long term geological storage [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low power CO 2 removal (LPCOR) and engineered structured sorbent (ESS) concepts that may be more energy efficient than traditional packed sorbent beds have been under development for several years. 20,21 Elements of the LPCOR and ESS concepts may be suitable for upgrading the ISS CDRA process architecture for exploration vehicle and habitat applications. The AES ARREM Project intends to investigate such an architecture in detail.…”
Section: B Cabin Atmosphere Conditioning Equipment 1 Carbon Dioxidementioning
confidence: 99%