1994
DOI: 10.12930/0271-9517-14.2.71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental Advising: The Elusive Ideal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…KEY WORDS: advising approaches, developmental advising, prescriptive advising, student satisfaction with advising Since Beal and Noel (1980) published their landmark report in which they found academic advising to be one of three major areas promoting student satisfaction and retention across 947 institutions of higher education, the importance of academic advising within universities has increased (Bedford & Durkee, 1989;Carstensen & Silberhorn, 1979;Pascarella & Terenzini, 1980;Steele, Kennedy, & Gordon, 1993;Tinto, 1998;Trombley & Holmes, 1981). The developmental advising approach, specifically, has gained increased credibility and has been referred to as the ideal approach for advising university students (Gordon, 1994). Authors of numerous studies have found that the developmental approach results in student satisfaction with advising (Alexitch, 1997;Broadbridge, 1996), and some have suggested that the developmental approach is preferred by students (Fielstein, 1989;Herndon, Kaiser, & Creamer, 1996;Winston & Sandor, 1984b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KEY WORDS: advising approaches, developmental advising, prescriptive advising, student satisfaction with advising Since Beal and Noel (1980) published their landmark report in which they found academic advising to be one of three major areas promoting student satisfaction and retention across 947 institutions of higher education, the importance of academic advising within universities has increased (Bedford & Durkee, 1989;Carstensen & Silberhorn, 1979;Pascarella & Terenzini, 1980;Steele, Kennedy, & Gordon, 1993;Tinto, 1998;Trombley & Holmes, 1981). The developmental advising approach, specifically, has gained increased credibility and has been referred to as the ideal approach for advising university students (Gordon, 1994). Authors of numerous studies have found that the developmental approach results in student satisfaction with advising (Alexitch, 1997;Broadbridge, 1996), and some have suggested that the developmental approach is preferred by students (Fielstein, 1989;Herndon, Kaiser, & Creamer, 1996;Winston & Sandor, 1984b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…81 Gordon (1994) listed the 10 reasons why developmental advising had not been implemented after many years: limited time, large advising loads that left no time for meaningful personal contact, no training, dearth of top administrative support for and funding of advising, lack of intrusive approaches, multiple advising units, unfamiliarity with diverse populations, and unclear assessment (pp. 71-74).…”
Section: Nacada Journal Volume 29 (2) Fall 2009mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rooney (1994) observed that many colleges and universities regularly conduct training for advisors and that ACT and NACADA jointly sponsor an annual intensive training institute. Gordon (1994) and Ryan (1995) each emphasized the importance of regular training and discussed possible topics that should be covered: advising and student development theory, interpersonal communication skills, career and study sktlls techniques, and referral information. Advising has become a complex profession in which the advisor works with the student in a variety of ways, fostering self-discovery and strong problem-solving skills transferable to all aspects of the student's experience.…”
Section: Nacada Journal Klume 18 (2) Fall 1998mentioning
confidence: 99%