2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2016.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental and molecular biology of annelid regeneration: a comparative review of recent studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

6
110
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
6
110
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Morgan proposed what has proven to be a resilient distinction between epimorphic regeneration, in which the replacement tissue is produced via cellular proliferation, and morphallactic regeneration, in which the tissue proximal to the wound is remodeled into a smaller version of the complete body part without proliferation at the wound site (Morgan 1901). Despite the breadth of taxon sampling that informed Morgan’s understanding of regeneration (Sunderland 2010), the categorization has not always been found to hold strictly true; many species that engage in epimorphosis also engage either simultaneously or sequentially in morphallactic remodeling (Özpolat and Bely 2016), whereas other regenerative mechanisms defy categorization when examined with modern tools. There are also substantial differences in the cellular mechanisms underlying examples of each type of regeneration (e.g., the wide variety of replacement tissue origins, [Tiozzo and Copley 2015]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Morgan proposed what has proven to be a resilient distinction between epimorphic regeneration, in which the replacement tissue is produced via cellular proliferation, and morphallactic regeneration, in which the tissue proximal to the wound is remodeled into a smaller version of the complete body part without proliferation at the wound site (Morgan 1901). Despite the breadth of taxon sampling that informed Morgan’s understanding of regeneration (Sunderland 2010), the categorization has not always been found to hold strictly true; many species that engage in epimorphosis also engage either simultaneously or sequentially in morphallactic remodeling (Özpolat and Bely 2016), whereas other regenerative mechanisms defy categorization when examined with modern tools. There are also substantial differences in the cellular mechanisms underlying examples of each type of regeneration (e.g., the wide variety of replacement tissue origins, [Tiozzo and Copley 2015]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2016; Özpolat and Bely 2016; Boilly et al. 2017), and are proving extremely beneficial for bilaterian-wide comparisons of a number of biological processes (Christodoulou et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The primary function of these photosensitive structures, and those more recently documented in ark clams, is likely to be shadow detection [6], but so far research into the underlying molecular mechanisms of the shadow reflex has been limited due to the dearth of molecular tools available in these model organisms. Platynereis dumerilii, a molecularly slowly evolving [8, 9], morphologically archetypical marine nereidid [10], and distant annelid relative of sabellid fan worms [1113], with its expansive genetic toolkit [14] and observable, well-characterised shadow reflex [15], represents a useful model to understand the molecular mechanisms and evolution of this behaviour. Platynereis dumerilii is a predominantly nocturnal animal, but the animals also exhibit movement and exploratory behaviour during the day, anchoring their trunks inside protective tubes whilst occasionally reaching out with their heads, likely to survey the environment and to feed [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%