1966
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.mi.20.100166.001125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental Changes During the Formation and Breaking of the Dormant State in Bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known, however, that persister cells revert to a susceptible state, or to an awakened state, upon reinoculation into fresh medium (2,28), in the presence of sugar metabolites (18), in the presence of environmental signals (97,98), by stochastic exit from dormancy (99, 100), or upon the addition of spent medium to preformed persister cells (17). Under these conditions, reversion to a susceptible state correlates with a sudden burst of transcription and translation (55) and the production of proteins necessary to perform cell repair (101). However, no reports have demonstrated that persister cells awake due to the presence of a specific signaling molecule.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known, however, that persister cells revert to a susceptible state, or to an awakened state, upon reinoculation into fresh medium (2,28), in the presence of sugar metabolites (18), in the presence of environmental signals (97,98), by stochastic exit from dormancy (99, 100), or upon the addition of spent medium to preformed persister cells (17). Under these conditions, reversion to a susceptible state correlates with a sudden burst of transcription and translation (55) and the production of proteins necessary to perform cell repair (101). However, no reports have demonstrated that persister cells awake due to the presence of a specific signaling molecule.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controls with no CA addition germinated, as confirmed by lack of growth in TG broth after heat shocking. Although bacterial spores may remain viable under extreme environmental conditions, germination may be inhibited by minor physical or chemical changes (Gould et al, 1970;Halvorson et al, 1966). Relatively small amounts of a chemical agent can be sporostatic, yet considerably higher concentrations are required to render spores non-viable or to inhibit vegetative cell growth (Bowles, 1991;Bowles and Miller 1993a,b;Smith and Dawes, 1989).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unsupplemented cultures contained 80 and 152.7 pgDPA/mL after 9 and 24 hr at 32"C, respectively. During initial germination phases, degradative processes of cortex embedded lytic en- zymes alter spore permeability with concomitant DPA release (Gould et al, 1970;Halvorson et al, 1966). Reduced DPA release suggested that CA precluded changes in spore coat permeability (Halvorson et al, 1966).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Bacillus cspeies, messenger RNA (mRNA) wass ynthesized de novo after the activation of spores and no stored mRNA appears to exist in spores (Halvorson et al 1966;Rodenberg et al 1968). Therefore, mRNA synthesis necessary for germination of bacterial spores should be induced after the initiation of germination, and then protein synthesis may be initiated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%