Developmental Epigenetics: Roles in Embryonic Development

This age period after 12 years is characterized by an increase in all dimensions of all the anatomical structures of the individuals, under the influence of new factors that interfere with the general tonus of the body.Purpose. Thus, in this paper, we approached certain aspects of both theoretical and practical that may occur in the formation and development of dento-maxillary system in the age period of 12 years (after some authors, up to the age of 21 years).Material and method. The study was conducted between May 12 and June 25 2018 with the help of 55 dental practitioners.Results and discussions. The analysis of the answers provided by the participants in the study was performed by means of specific research methods. The results are eloquent and provide an overview of how dental practitioners manage the eruption of the wisdom tooth in the developmental processes of the dento-maxillary system.Conclusions. The eruption of the wisdom tooth is a certain element of growth, which must be taken into account in the future therapeutic approach of the morpho-functional imbalances of the dento-maxillary system.

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Theoretical and practical considerations in the treatment of morphofunctional imbalances of dento-maxillary system for the age period after 12 years – preliminary study

Beuran¹,

Pharmacy²,

Ionescu³

et al. 2019

“…Fixed implant-supported prosthetic restorations have the great advantage of not requiring the preparation of teeth limiting the edentulous space, but are a treatment method that requires a much longer period of time and much higher costs (1)(2)(3)(4)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17).…”

Section: Purposementioning

confidence: 99%

Single tooth edentation caused by missing of the 6-year mollar (maxillary and/or mandible) – consequences and fix prosthetic treatment solutions

Beuran¹,

Ionescu²,

Eftene³

et al. 2019

The loss of first permanent molars, maxillary and/or mandibular, can lead in time, due to the lack of prosthetic restoration, to a series of complications, some of high gravity, which can cause not only severe difficulties in subsequent prosthetic rehabilitation, but also substantial additional costs for patients.Purpose. Thus, in this material we tried to bring to the attention of dental practitioners the most truthful arguments, for a fixed prosthetic restoration as early and efficient as possible.Material and method. 53 dental practitioners, from different cities of the country, took part in this study conducted between May 2017 and April 2019.Results and discussions. The answers obtained by applying the questionnaire were analyzed statistically and exposed for a better understanding by clear graphical methods.Conclusions. The restoration of this type of single tooth edentation produced by the absence of the 6-yearold molar, regardless of location (maxillary and / or mandibular), is considered by most dental practitioners to be relatively simple, regardless of the therapeutic option selected.

“…Thus, the insertion of dental implants and subsequent creation of implant-supported restorations in smoker patients up to 60 cigarettes a day is not, from our point of view, a prohibition, but involves a set of recommendations from the medical team which must be implemented by the patients, for the success of subsequent implant-prosthetic rehabilitation. But the insertion of dental implants for patients who smoke on daily average from 60 cigarettes up, we do not recommend the use of these devices because the risk of rejection can become a certainty (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16).…”

Section: General Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Theoretical and practical aspects regarding the implant-prosthetic rehabilitation in smoker patients – preliminary study

Paval¹,

Mihai²,

Burlibașa³

et al. 2019

Implant-prosthetic rehabilitation (both the surgical step of inserting dental implants and also the stage of creating the implant-supported prosthetic restorations) in smokers patients poses particular problems not only for the medical team but also for the patients (and here we refer in particular to the average number of cigarettes smoked daily).Purpose. In this paper we have attempted to present a multitude of factors both theoretical and practical, which can intervene in the implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of heavy smoker patients.Material and method. The study was conducted between April 2018 and November 2018 by applying a questionnaire with 6 questions. The 31 subjects enrolled in the study were aged between 29 to 67years old, specialists and/or primary doctors of general dentistry, dental prosthodontics or dental surgery.Results and discussions. Centralized results have been processed to provide a clearer picture of the current attitude towards heavy smokers for oral rehabilitation with the implant-supported restorations.Conclusions. The insertion of dental implants and subsequent creation of implant-supported restorations are not an interdiction for heavy smokers (up to 60 cigarettes a day) but requires the involvement of both the medical team and especially the patients in the follow-up care period to increase long-term success of dental implants and prosthetic restorations made thereon.