International Conference on Computing, Communication &Amp; Automation 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ccaa.2015.7148348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental pattern analysis and age prediction by extracting speech features and applying various classification techniques

Abstract: In speech development research, it's important to know how speech acoustic features vary as a function of age and the age when the variability and magnitude of acoustic features start to exhibit adult-like patterns. During the first few years of life, a child's speech changes from the cries and babbles of an infant to adult-like words and phrases of a young child. A number of acoustic studies observed that, adult's speech compared to children's speech, exhibits lower pitch and formant frequencies, shorter segm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the investigations verifed the masterminded strategy has some higher results than those maltreatment the techniques. Gautam, et al (2015). Irrefutably, disfluency of talk among youngsters is dissected maintained the understandability assessment by talk and language pathologists, which may be past a sensible uncertainty won and long.…”
Section: Lazli Et Al (2017)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the investigations verifed the masterminded strategy has some higher results than those maltreatment the techniques. Gautam, et al (2015). Irrefutably, disfluency of talk among youngsters is dissected maintained the understandability assessment by talk and language pathologists, which may be past a sensible uncertainty won and long.…”
Section: Lazli Et Al (2017)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigation of age prediction from gait data can be found in [44,105], while [46,106] investigate the prediction of age from iris data using different sets of geometric and texture features. In [45,100,107], the authors have investigated the prediction of age from voice data, and Merkel et al [108] examines the prediction of subject age from the fingerprint. Predictive accuracies range from a minimum of 57% (for the iris modality) to a maximum of 77% (for the signature modality), but the problems noted above make drawing specific conclusions unwise.…”
Section: Age Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, low-arousal speeches are classified by 98.9% of success rate according to their genders, and 61.3% success rate according their ages. In another study, 134 children whose ages varying between 4 and 8, and 18 adults are classified according to their age groups [8] . Adult speakers are regarded as one group, and children are classified into 5 different groups according to their ages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%