1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-2244(00)89168-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developments in food packaging integrity testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Harper et al (1995) reported that the presence of channel leaks with a diameter of 250 µm and 200 µm was not detected in respectively a burst and a tensile test and therefore did not influence the seal strength. The authors also stated that it is difficult to define the minimum defect dimensions that permit microbial contamination, since this process does not only depend on the dimensions of the defect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harper et al (1995) reported that the presence of channel leaks with a diameter of 250 µm and 200 µm was not detected in respectively a burst and a tensile test and therefore did not influence the seal strength. The authors also stated that it is difficult to define the minimum defect dimensions that permit microbial contamination, since this process does not only depend on the dimensions of the defect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water-filled channels proved harder to detect than airfilled channels, but it was shown that on a conveyor moving at 500mm/s the system could detect air-filled channels much smaller than 50 microns in width. Harper et al (1995) describe the use of light penetration tests to inspect the thickness of the seals, whereby a translucent seal allows more light to pass through if the adhesive is not thick enough to ensure a strong seal. However this is no longer a common cause of seal faults, perhaps due to better quality control during pack manufacturing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, seal region defects are detected through visual inspection or destructive testing. However, channels smaller than 50 µm in diameter are not clearly visible to the naked eye, and destructive testing is only valuable statistically (9) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%