Développements formels d'interfaces multimodales fondés sur la preuve et le raffinement. Scénarios de développement

Aït‐Ameur, Yamine; Aït-Sadoune, Idir; Baron, Mickaël; Mota, Jean-Marc

doi:10.3166/isi.13.2.127-154

Cited by 6 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A development lifecycle for generating source code for HMI from an abstract model is presented in [3]. The Event-B language is used for developing the multi-model interactive system supporting with CARE properties using correct by construction approach in [4]. In [19], the authors propose an approach with supported tools based on CAV architecture, hybrid model of MVC and PAC, for developing HMI from specification to implementation.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Formal Development of Multi-Purpose Interactive Application (MPIA) for ARINC 661

Singh

Aït‐Ameur

Méry

et al. 2020

Communications in Computer and Information Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reports our experience for developing Human-Machine Interface (HMI) complying with ARINC 661 specification standard for interactive cockpits applications using formal methods. This development relies on the FLUID modelling language, we have proposed and formally defined in the FORMEDICIS 1 project. FLUID contains essential features required for specifying HMI. To develop the MultiPurpose Interactive Applications (MPIA) use case, we follow the following steps: an abstract model of MPIA is written using the FLUID language; this MPIA FLUID model is used to produce an Event-B model for checking the functional behaviour, user interactions, safety properties, and interaction related to domain properties; the Event-B model is also used to check temporal properties and possible scenario using the ProB model checker; and finally, the MPIA FLUID model is translated to Interactive Cooperative Objects (ICO) using the PetShop CASE tool to validate the dynamic behaviour, visual properties and task analysis. These steps rely on different tools to check internal consistency along with possible HMI properties. Finally, the formal development of the MPIA case study using FLUID and its embedding into other formal techniques, demonstrates reliability, scalability and feasibility of our approach defined in the FORMEDICIS project.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Formal Development of Multi-Purpose Interactive Application (MPIA) for ARINC 661

Singh

Aït‐Ameur

Méry

et al. 2020

Communications in Computer and Information Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Silva et al [36] propose an approach to generate user interface software, particularly in Java, from a declarative description in the Teallach MB-UIDE. CARE properties are defined using the first order logic in [10]. A new tool-supported approach from specification to the implementation is proposed in [24].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This approach is based on CAV architecture, which is a hybrid model of the MVC and PAC models. The Event-B language is also used for developing the multimodel interactive system using a correct by construction approach in [10]. The ARCH architecture [29] is used during the development of the multi-model interactive system.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Refinement Based Formal Development of Human-Machine Interface

Geniet

Singh

2018

Software Technologies: Applications and Foundations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Human factors have been considered as the most common causes of accidents, particularly for interacting with complex critical systems related to avionics, railway, nuclear and medical domains. Mostly, a human-machine interface (HMI) is developed independently and the correctness of possible interactions is heavily dependent on testing, which cannot guarantee the absence of runtime errors. The use of formal methods in HMI development may assure such guarantee. This paper presents a methodology for developing an HMI using a correct by construction approach, which allows us to introduce the HMI components, functional behaviour and the required safety properties progressively. The proposed methodology, generic refinement strategy, supports a development of the model-view-controller (MVC) architecture. The whole approach is formalized using Event-B and relies on the Rodin tools to check the internal consistency with respect to the given safety properties, invariants and events. Finally, an industrial case study is used to illustrate the effectiveness of our proposed approach for developing an HMI.

show abstract

“…Plusieurs raffinements sont nécessaires avant d'aboutir au modèle représentant les différentes composantes du système interactif décrit ainsi que les propriétés pertinentes. Plusieurs scénarios de raffinement pour les systèmes interactifs ontétéétudiés et comparés dans [6].À l'image des systèmes de transitions, un modèle B evénementiel décrit un système réactif par un ensemble d'événements (clause EVENTS) qui modifient unétat (clause VARIABLES). Le raffinement permet de bâtir ce modèle parétapes en introduisant de nouveauxévénements tout en préservant les propriétés préalablementétablies (clauses IN-VARIANT et ASSERTIONS).…”

Section: La Méthode Bévénementielunclassified

“…Dans le cadre du projet VERBATIM, nous avons identifié quatre scénarios de conception d'IHM3 fondée sur la preuve. Quatre scénarios sont détaillés dans [6]. Chacun décrit une implantation de la composition des composants noyau fonctionnel et de la présentation pour définir le CD : A ce niveau, il faut observer que tous lesévénements peuventêtre déclenchés.…”

Section: Conception De L'ihm3unclassified

Validation et vérification formelles de systèmes interactifs multi-modaux fondées sur la preuve

Aït‐Ameur

Aït-Sadoune

Mota

et al. 2006

Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Association Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine - IHM '06

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cet article s'intéresseà la validation età la vérification formelles d'IHM Multi-Modales (IHM3). Il décrit une partie des résultats obtenus dans le cadre du projet RNRT VERBATIM, dont l'objet est la VERification Biformelle et l'Automatisation du Test des Interfaces Multimodales. Ce projet s'intéresse, entre autres,à la mise en oeuvre d'une technique formelle fondée sur la preuve : la méthode Bévénementiel. Nous discutons les apports de cette technique pour la conception d'IHM3, en particulier, sa capacitéà exprimer età vérifier des propriétés de la famille CARE. Notre approche utilise et propose de formaliser des notations et techniques semi-formelles issues du domaine des IHM.

show abstract

Développements formels d'interfaces multimodales fondés sur la preuve et le raffinement. Scénarios de développement

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Formal Development of Multi-Purpose Interactive Application (MPIA) for ARINC 661

Formal Development of Multi-Purpose Interactive Application (MPIA) for ARINC 661

Refinement Based Formal Development of Human-Machine Interface

Validation et vérification formelles de systèmes interactifs multi-modaux fondées sur la preuve

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About