Deviant Peer Preferences: A Simplified Approach to Account for Peer Selection Effects

Gallupe, Owen; Boman, John H.; Nash, Rebecca; Castro, Erin D.

doi:10.1080/01639625.2019.1597321

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Peers are models of learning and imitation, so adolescents are more likely to have more cyberbullying under the influence of deviant peers. 40 We found that moral disengagement mediating the relationship between parent-adolescent conflict and adolescents' cyberbullying, also deviant peer affiliation and adolescents' cyberbullying. Parent-adolescent conflict shows a negative interpersonal conflict communication pattern for adolescents, this pattern will change their moral cognition which may result in an ill cognitive of moral disengagement.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 68%

See 1 more Smart Citation

How Does Parent-Adolescent Conflict and Deviant Peer Affiliation Affect Cyberbullying: Examining the Roles of Moral Disengagement and Gender

Liang¹,

Jiang²,

Zhang³

et al. 2022

PRBM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose With the widespread use of the Internet and mobile phone, cyberbullying has become a new type of bullying among adolescents. It is of great practical significance to explore the relevant factors affecting cyberbullying for prevention and intervention of adolescents’ cyberbullying. However, few studies have considered the effect of both the family and social factors on cyberbullying. Therefore, the current study examines whether the parent-adolescent conflict as a family factor and deviant peer affiliation as a social factor have an effect on adolescents’ cyberbullying, as well as the role of moral disengagement and gender. Methods A total of 777 middle school students (females = 336; mean age = 13.57; SD = 0.98) were surveyed by using the Parent-child Relationship Questionnaire, Deviant Peer Affiliation Questionnaire, Moral Disengagement Questionnaire and Cyber Bullying Behavior Questionnaire. SPSS21.0 was used to conduct descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis and T -test, PROCESS were used to conduct significance test of moderated mediation effect on the data. Results Parent-adolescent conflict does not directly predict cyberbullying. Moral disengagement played a complete mediating role between parent-adolescent conflict and cyberbullying, and gender played a moderating role between moral disengagement and cyberbullying. Deviant peer affiliation directly predict cyberbullying. Moral disengagement played a partially mediating role between parent-adolescent conflict and cyberbullying, and gender played a moderating role between moral disengagement and cyberbullying. Conclusion Attention should be paid to the effect of moral disengagement on cyberbullying in family and social factors, as well as the role of gender.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 68%

“…Peers are models of learning and imitation, so adolescents are more likely to have more cyberbullying under the influence of deviant peers. 40 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How Does Parent-Adolescent Conflict and Deviant Peer Affiliation Affect Cyberbullying: Examining the Roles of Moral Disengagement and Gender

Liang¹,

Jiang²,

Zhang³

et al. 2022

PRBM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Association with deviant peers is related to the engagement in deviant and delinquent behavior (Agnew, 1991;Warr and Stafford, 1991;Sutherland et al, 1992;Matsueda and Anderson, 1998;Haynie and Osgood, 2005;Akers, 2017). The inquiry of whether one is deviant because one belongs to a deviant group, encompassed in the socialization theories (Agnew, 1985(Agnew, , 1991Warr and Stafford, 1991;Dishion and Tipsord, 2011;Lin and Yi, 2016;Akers, 2017;McGloin and Thomas, 2019;Schwartz et al, 2019), or whether one chooses to be a part of a group with antisocial behavior because of a personal inclination for deviance, known as selection mechanism (Matsueda and Anderson, 1998;Haynie and Osgood, 2005;Barnes et al, 2006;Schwartz et al, 2019;Gallupe et al, 2020), helps capture this causal relationship.…”

Section: Socializationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adolescent Deviance and Cyber-Deviance. A Systematic Literature Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Deviance is a complex phenomenon that influences aspects both at the macro and micro levels, extensively studied by social scientists The main objective of this article was to conduct a systematic literature review for clustering the topics on adolescent deviance and online deviance. Grounded in Pickering's and Byrne's guidelines and PRISMA protocol, we identified the most recurrent themes, theories and predictors in the 61 most-cited articles related to the concept of deviance from the database of Web of Science, as well as in 488 abstracts of representative papers. The results emphasized four main clusters of topics, namely, predictors of deviance, online deviance, socio-constructivist theories, and research based theories of deviant behavior. The findings highlighted that researchers frequently use strain theory, social learning, self-control, and social control theories in their studies. Our systematic literature review revealed also the most encountered predictors of deviance, which we have classified into five main categories: family patterns, socio-demographic aspects, socialization, victimization, and school and individual factors. For online deviance, family patterns, socio-demographic aspects, victimization, school and individual factors, and Internet and computer use have been determined to be the main groups of predictors. The present systematic literature review makes an important contribution to the understanding of deviance by presenting an overview of the phenomenon.

show abstract

“…The net result of selection and recruitment effects is that individual differences in traits will be correlated with the behavioral characteristics of friends and the friendship network. For example, groups of adolescents with high levels of antisocial behavior are expected to form because youth with the personality structures associated with antisocial behavior (i.e., impulsivity and aggression) will select into relationships with others who have similar traits and behaviors (Burk et al, 2007 ; Gallupe et al, 2020 ). Consequently, the aggregation of people with a personality structure that leans toward antisocial behavior will result in a network of friends with increasingly similar levels of antisocial behaviors over time.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Personality and peer groups in adolescence: Reciprocal associations and shared genetic and environmental influences

Clark

Durbin

Heitzeg

et al. 2022

Journal of Personality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Peer groups provide a critical developmental context in adolescence, and there are many well-documented associations between personality and peer behavior at this age. However, the precise nature and direction of these associations are difficult to determine as youth both select into and are influenced by their friends. We thus examined the phenotypic, genetic, and environmental links between antisocial and prosocial peer characteristics and several personality traits from middle childhood to late adolescence (ages 11, 14, and 17 years) in a longitudinal twin sample (N = 3762) using teacher ratings of personality, and self-reports of peer characteristics. At both within-person and between-person levels of analysis, less adaptive trait profiles (i.e., high negative emotionality, low conscientiousness, and low agreeableness) were associated with more antisocial and fewer prosocial peer characteristics. Associations between personality traits related to emotionality (negative emotionality and extraversion) and peer behavior were largely attributable to shared genetic influences, while associations between personality traits related to behavioral control (conscientiousness and agreeableness) and peer behavior were due to overlapping genetic and shared environmental influences. There was also some evidence for reciprocity and corresponsive processes such that traits in early adolescence contributed to selection into certain peer groups, which in turn extenuated those personality traits. Taken together, results suggest a set of environmental presses that push youth towards both behavioral undercontrol and antisocial peer affiliations, making the identification of such influences and their relative importance a critical avenue of future work.

show abstract

Deviant Peer Preferences: A Simplified Approach to Account for Peer Selection Effects

Cited by 5 publications

References 50 publications

How Does Parent-Adolescent Conflict and Deviant Peer Affiliation Affect Cyberbullying: Examining the Roles of Moral Disengagement and Gender

How Does Parent-Adolescent Conflict and Deviant Peer Affiliation Affect Cyberbullying: Examining the Roles of Moral Disengagement and Gender

Adolescent Deviance and Cyber-Deviance. A Systematic Literature Review

Personality and peer groups in adolescence: Reciprocal associations and shared genetic and environmental influences

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About