2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0038-1101(03)00289-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Device modeling and simulation of the performance of Cu(In1−x,Gax)Se2 solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
83
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2b, inset. The experimental and simulation studies have shown that double grading in the CIGS absorber layer has greatly improved the performance of single-junction CIGS cells [40,41]. For detailed information on grading schemes and their benefits in device performance, the readers can refer the cited literatures [42][43][44].…”
Section: Cise/cigse Materials Properties and Device Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2b, inset. The experimental and simulation studies have shown that double grading in the CIGS absorber layer has greatly improved the performance of single-junction CIGS cells [40,41]. For detailed information on grading schemes and their benefits in device performance, the readers can refer the cited literatures [42][43][44].…”
Section: Cise/cigse Materials Properties and Device Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We referred to model B of the results of Frisk et al [14]. We used a linear DGB structure of the CIGS layer with a ZnS buffer as [4][5][6], where the minimum bandgap of 1.1 eV is located at a depth of 0.25 μm in the CIGS from the interface of the ZnS buffer, and the maximum bandgap is 1.5 eV at a depth of 1.8 μm contacting the Mo layer as shown in Figure 1 …”
Section: Experiments and Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gloeckler and Sites, and Song et al reported that the improvement in back grading in the CIGS solar cell could potentially increase the efficiency when the thickness of the absorber decreased [4][5][6]. In 2004 and 2010, Song et al reported various bandgap profiles in the CIGS layer and suggested an optimum bandgap structure, the double graded bandgap (DGB, bandgap gradings on both front and back sides of the CIGS absorption layer) profile using the AMPS-1D and DESSIS 2D simulators [5,6]; the front grading improved the open circuit voltage (V OC ) without reducing the short circuit current density (J SC ) and the back grading improved the V OC . Dullweber et al reported the effect of back grading on the CIGS layer, which suppressed the carrier recombination and resulted in an enhancement in the V OC by up to 0.09 V [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density of defects at the interface CIGS/CdS was varied from 10 14 to 10 20 cm -2 . All these materials are well known materials and their properties can be easily found in the literature and experimental studies available in references [5][6][7].…”
Section: Cell Structure and Materials Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were several numerical studies for investigation of thin film solar cells and these reports investigate parameters of cells, which directly contribute in performance of thin film cell [4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%