2013
DOI: 10.1109/jstqe.2013.2239262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Device Scaling Considerations for Nanophotonic CMOS Global Interconnects

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, decreasing the optical mode volume, V m , introduces adverse effects, for example, bending losses, and ohmic losses for polaritonic modes. It is therefore not straightforward to predict optoelectronic performance for device scaling into the nanoscale1314, and a rigorous analysis of fundamental scaling laws for nanophotonics as a function of critical device length is warranted. Here, we investigate the performances of four actively-controlled (electrically or optically) devices with respect to their scaling behavior: a light source, an electrical-to-optical (EO) data encoder typically in form of an electro-optic modulator, and a photodetector for the inverse OE conversion, along with a fourth device, which is a purely optical switch for all-optical information processing (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, decreasing the optical mode volume, V m , introduces adverse effects, for example, bending losses, and ohmic losses for polaritonic modes. It is therefore not straightforward to predict optoelectronic performance for device scaling into the nanoscale1314, and a rigorous analysis of fundamental scaling laws for nanophotonics as a function of critical device length is warranted. Here, we investigate the performances of four actively-controlled (electrically or optically) devices with respect to their scaling behavior: a light source, an electrical-to-optical (EO) data encoder typically in form of an electro-optic modulator, and a photodetector for the inverse OE conversion, along with a fourth device, which is a purely optical switch for all-optical information processing (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the latter, using closed-form expressions for the mutual and ground capacitances [26] and the peak crosstalk voltage [24], we estimate a crosstalk coupling of −2 dB. In general, the figures of merit for interconnect performance are energyper-bit-per-length, bandwidth-per-pitch, and bandwidth-perarea [27]. Spintronic interconnects (spin wave and domain wall) can provide improvements in performance when compared with the CMOS interconnects in terms of energy-perbit-per-length [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, optical interconnects are considered as a good solution to remedy the problems faced by electric wires and can refashion the inter-chip data communications systems [2][3][4]. The quality of optical receivers in optical wireless communication systems (OWCS) greatly determines the total power consumption in these systems, where it is crucial to develop receivers' with faster and efficient response.…”
Section: In This Paper a New Junctionless Optical Controlled Field Ementioning
confidence: 99%