2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2018.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Devices for home detection of obstructive sleep apnea: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
66
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the developed algorithm uses a simple classifier (LR) and easy to implement features. Both are relevant characteristics for a small and non-invasive HMD [13]. The other analyzed methods reported a lower global accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the developed algorithm uses a simple classifier (LR) and easy to implement features. Both are relevant characteristics for a small and non-invasive HMD [13]. The other analyzed methods reported a lower global accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Such devices can be categorized as a Type IV according to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine categorization [12]. The hypothesis is supported by the conclusions of two reviews, one that examined HMD for OSA examination [13] and the other that examined proposed methods for the most common source sensors employed for OSA diagnosis [14]. It was verified that combining source sensors did not contribute to a substantial increase of the classification capability, suggesting that one of the sensors is dominating the examination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the high prevalence, for clinical purposes, recording devices for sleep disordered breathing were reduced to the essentials [ 9 , 10 ▪ ]. The agreed essentials are airflow, respiratory effort, oxygen saturation, HR (or ECG or pulse rate), body position, some surrogate for sleep time (could be just self reported), sometimes snoring [ 10 ▪ ]. Devices based on these six channels/signals had been validated against the gold standard PSG and have proven to deliver accurate diagnoses when compared between centres [ 11 ].…”
Section: Home Sleep Apnoea Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the 48 patients studied, a good correlation (r 2 = 0.723) and mean difference of 3.1 between the AHI from the two systems was found. The system described in this paper is now one of many nonlaboratory diagnostic systems for apnea on the market [9] with the majority intended for home based sleep testing (i.e. Type 3 and 4 sleep tests [10]).…”
Section: Ventilation and Respiratory Rate Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%