2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.05.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DFT modeling of CO 2 and Ar low-pressure adsorption for accurate nanopore structure characterization in organic-rich shales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CO2 adsorption at 273 K provides more detailed information of micropores. Ar and CO2 adsorptions have been combined to characterize nanopore structure of shale [47]. As for Ar adsorption, Brunauer−Emmett−Teller (BET) model was used to obtain specific surface areas (As), and Barrett, Joyner and Halenda (BJH) model was used to characterize pore size distributions (PSD).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO2 adsorption at 273 K provides more detailed information of micropores. Ar and CO2 adsorptions have been combined to characterize nanopore structure of shale [47]. As for Ar adsorption, Brunauer−Emmett−Teller (BET) model was used to obtain specific surface areas (As), and Barrett, Joyner and Halenda (BJH) model was used to characterize pore size distributions (PSD).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of the pore volume or the pore-size distribution through gasadsorption isotherm methods relies on mechanisms driving the adsorption of a gas. In the case of shales, this method is dominated by physisorption or physical adsorption of the commonly used gases, e.g., CO 2 , N 2 , Ar [51][52][53][54]. The adsorption process consists of the accumulation of gas molecules on a surface (usually a solid) through weak van der Waals and electrostatic interactions, giving gas molecules the ability to form a single layer or multiple ones on the surface.…”
Section: Adsorption Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to DFT versatile use for microporous and mesoporous materials, we believe that PSD in Figure 2(a) is in agreement with actual pores structure. Furthermore, DFT is considered as a better method of analyzing nanopores than BJH, as stated in [29]. On the other hand, BJH method Journal of Nanomaterials may be used for evaluating PSD for pores with higher diameter than 30 nm, thus presenting results for whole mesoporous structure.…”
Section: Textural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%