2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-013-7999-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DFT study of chromium-doped SnO2 materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we took into consideration the strong Coulomb interactions for the localized d electrons of Fe and Cr as well, therefore introducing the U term parameter for the 3d states of Cr and the 3d states of Fe. The choice for the Hubbard term in this work was 4 eV for Cr and 6.4 for Fe, in accordance with previous work 38 , 39 .
Figure 4 DOS of Cr-doped TiO 2 with Cr as interstitial dopant (Cr i ) under biaxial tensile stress of ( a ) 0 GPa ( b ) 4 GPa ( c ) 8 GPa and DOS of TiO 2 with Cr as substitutional dopant (Cr Ti ) under biaxial tensile stress of ( d ) 0 GPa ( e ) 4 GPa and ( f ) 8 GPa .
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here we took into consideration the strong Coulomb interactions for the localized d electrons of Fe and Cr as well, therefore introducing the U term parameter for the 3d states of Cr and the 3d states of Fe. The choice for the Hubbard term in this work was 4 eV for Cr and 6.4 for Fe, in accordance with previous work 38 , 39 .
Figure 4 DOS of Cr-doped TiO 2 with Cr as interstitial dopant (Cr i ) under biaxial tensile stress of ( a ) 0 GPa ( b ) 4 GPa ( c ) 8 GPa and DOS of TiO 2 with Cr as substitutional dopant (Cr Ti ) under biaxial tensile stress of ( d ) 0 GPa ( e ) 4 GPa and ( f ) 8 GPa .
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In our calculations the generalized-gradient approximation along with the Hubbard U correction was applied. The parameter U set to 8.2 eV for the Ti 3d orbitals, 4 eV for Cr 3d orbitals and 6.4 eV for Fe 3d orbitals 14 , 38 , 39 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…U ¼ 4:0 eV was obtained as a proper value for Sn 4d electrons after parameterization was performed previously. 32 Introduction of Hubbard U-like term allows getting a band gap width equal to 1.93 eV. That is considerably larger as band gap value of 1.14 eV obtained by the standard DFT approach and thus justi¯es the use of the GGA þ U.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The changes of bandgap and energy band cannot affect the electronic structure analysis of SnO 2 crystals. The bandgap value can be modified by the complex variable function method (DFT + U) [20] to obtain a more accurate bandgap value. Although there are still some issues needed to be solved with this method, it is sufficient to mainly discuss the photoelectric properties of doped SnO 2 .…”
Section: Band Structure and Density Of Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%