2007
DOI: 10.1109/tvlsi.2007.903945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DFT Techniques and Automation for Asynchronous NULL Conventional Logic Circuits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are mainly two approaches in the literature to make the NCL circuits testable: limited insertion of control/observation points to increase fault coverage [10], [11], and synchronous modeling of NCL pipelines to make them compatible with synchronous ATPG tools and using scan chain technique [12].…”
Section: Related Work 31ncl Specific Dft Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are mainly two approaches in the literature to make the NCL circuits testable: limited insertion of control/observation points to increase fault coverage [10], [11], and synchronous modeling of NCL pipelines to make them compatible with synchronous ATPG tools and using scan chain technique [12].…”
Section: Related Work 31ncl Specific Dft Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The XOR tree, however, requires a lot of space, especially for more complex designs with several pipeline stages, and also increases the number of primary outputs significantly, so this is not very practical. In order to cope with low fault coverage, Satagopan et al [10] then proposed to break the internal feedback path inside every NCL gate and insert a latch. This technique is shown to significantly improve testability (almost 100% fault coverage), but it requires substantial area overhead, which makes it impractical.…”
Section: 11limited Insertion Of Control/observation Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Banerjee et al in [13] The schemes proposed in [9] focused on breaking the feedback paths, both globally and locally. Breaking such loops ensures that the complexity of the test is reduced to that of a combinational circuit.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wires connecting components do not need to adhere to the isochronic fork assumption. NCL circuits often outperform other delay-insensitive methods because they target a wider range of logical operators, as opposed to others that target standard, more restricted sets [1], [4], [5] Testing asynchronous circuits has been a major challenge [7]- [9]. In order to compete with their synchronous counterparts, asynchronous schemes must be capable of producing VLSI circuits that are at least as readily testable as synchronous circuits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation