Diabetes Mellitus: Glucose Control

Somasundaram, Noel; Wijeyaratne, Chandrika; Silva, Shamya De; Siribaddana, Sisira; Illangasekera, Upali; Rajaratnam, Henry; Katulanda, Prasad; Bulugahapitiya, Uditha; Siyambalapitiya, Sajith; Antonypillai, Charles; Sumanatilleke, Manilka; Katulanda, Gaya; Jayawardena, Priyankara; Kalupahana, Nishan S.; Jayatissa, Renuka; Garusinghe, Chaminda; Muthukuda, Dimuthu; Widanege, N. Meegoda; Weerakkody, Muditha; Pathmanathan, S.; Abhayaratna, Sachith; Kahandawa, Shyaminda; Gunawardane, Kavinga; Karunasena, Nayananjani; Aravindhan, M; Swarnasri, Wst

doi:10.4038/sjdem.v3i1.5505

Cited by 10 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Grading recommendations in accordance with the nature and relative complexities of barriers that need to be navigated for successful implementationd translatability scale (13)dis therefore advised. A good example is the IDF's global guideline (40), which was emulated by the Sri Lankan and Indian guidelines (41,42) where recommendations were divided into minimal, standard, and comprehensive care. The Belize guideline (43) also separated investigations into two categories: the required minimum and those to be carried out only if clinically indicated.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gaps in Guidelines for the Management of Diabetes in Low- and Middle-Income Versus High-Income Countries—A Systematic Review

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gaps in Guidelines for the Management of Diabetes in Low- and Middle-Income Versus High-Income Countries—A Systematic Review

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, FBS and BMI were also reduced significantly in study participants. This shows that study participants were able to reach the target HbA1c level ≤ 7.0% of Sri Lanka [29]. Further, it revealed that implementation of the new educational material had led to significant improvement in self-management of T2DM among patients in relation to glycemic improvement by adaptation on self-care activities such as appropriate diet, regular exercise, appropriate use of medications and regular follow-up.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 80%

Validation of educational material for diabetes self-management education: Judgemental and criterion validity

Kisokanth¹,

Prathapan²,

Indrakumar³

et al. 2018

biomedicalresearch

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To describe the validation process of an educational material for diabetes self-management education among patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Methods: Methodological study, developed in three phases: construction of the educational material, validation of the educational material by judges, and by patients with T2DM (criterion validity). The validation process was conducted by 7 judges and 30 patients with T2DM. Criterion validity was assessed against gold standard by field expert. A 70% or more total disagreement of any of the items by the experts was decided to remove from the educational material. Criterion validity was measured by sensitivity, specificity, as well as the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The expected primary outcome was the HbA1c level to be decreased by 0.5% or more after the implementation of intervention guide among patients with T2DM. Results: The changes suggested by judges were accepted and included in the final version of the educational material. All experts (100%) agreed that illustrations and texts in the education material motivate the patient with T2DM to understand the important of lifestyle modifications. The sensitivity of the developed intervention guide was 81.5% (95% CI=61.9-93.7%) with a specificity of 100.0% (95% CI=15 which was statistically significant (p=0.000). Conclusion: The educational material was validated in terms of judgment and criterion validity. It would be used by nurse health educators for diabetes self-management education..

show abstract

“…The use of glucometer is particularly suitable for patients on multiple insulin doses or insulin pump therapy. 14 The application of SMBG is useful for monitoring daily control and to diagnose hypoglycaemic or hyperglycaemic episodes.…”

Section: Assessment Of Glycaemic Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The optimal method for monitoring the glycaemic control includes a combination of laboratory confirmed FPG, 2h-PG, HbA1c levels and self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) level. 14 Table 4 lists the content and structure of a diabetic education programme. 17…”

Section: Monitoring and Follow-upmentioning

confidence: 99%

National Consensus Statement on the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Nepal

Shrestha¹,

Shrestha²,

Sharma³

et al. 2019

Jour of Diab and Endo Assoc of Nepal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Diabetes Mellitus: Glucose Control

Cited by 10 publications

References 4 publications

Gaps in Guidelines for the Management of Diabetes in Low- and Middle-Income Versus High-Income Countries—A Systematic Review

Gaps in Guidelines for the Management of Diabetes in Low- and Middle-Income Versus High-Income Countries—A Systematic Review

Validation of educational material for diabetes self-management education: Judgemental and criterion validity

National Consensus Statement on the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Nepal

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About