Diabetes Mellitus Knowledge Test: development, psychometric evaluation, and establishing norms for Indian population

Padhy, Meera; Padiri, Ruth Angiel; Hariharan, Meena; Rana, Suvashisa

doi:10.1007/s13410-018-0644-z

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…cj (Persian version)[145]; T2DHPS (Turkish version)[146]; DHPSC ck (Chinese version)[147]; PDQ-11cl [148];C-PDQ cm[149] •PROMs that assess health-promoting lifestyle behaviours of patients with diabetes.•Examples of domains assessed include physical activity, risk reduction, stress management, health responsibility, enjoyment of life, and healthy diet.Health-promoting lifestyle behaviorsHealth Belief Measures[150]; Given Health Belief Instrument (Spanish version)[151]; Health Belief Model Scale (Turkish version)[152]; Diabetes Health Belief Measure[153] • PROMs that assess diabetes-specific health beliefs of patients.•Examples of domains assessed include perceived benefits of and barriers to treatment and perceived severity of and vulnerability to complications.Health beliefsDiabetes Questionnaire[154]; Diabetes Questionnaire (Spanish version)[154]; Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (Spanish version)[31]; DKQ-24 cn[153]; DMKT co[155]; PCSD-P cp[156]; Miller et al[157]; Miller and Edwards[158]; PDDC cq[159]; DRNK cr[160]; FCCHL cs (Norwegian version)[161];KHLS-DM ct[162]; HLS-K cu[163]; HLS/SNS cv[164]; Ashok et al 1[165]; Ashok et al 2[166]; HLS-EU-Q47 cw[167] • PROMs that assess the level of diabetes knowledge, whether in general or for specific areas of knowledge such as nutrition knowledge.•Examples of domains assessed include symptoms (eg, frequent hunger), causes and risk factors (eg, lack of physical activity), complications (eg, kidney failure), and management (eg, reduced consumption of rice). cx[79]; DTSQ (Greek version)[171]; DiabMedSat cy[172]; DTBQ cz[169]; ITEQ da[168]; IITQ db[170]; ITAS dc[173]; C-ITAS-HK...…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review

Wee¹,

Kwan²,

Loh³

et al. 2021

J Med Internet Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The management of diabetes is complex. There is growing recognition of the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as a standardized method of obtaining an outlook on patients’ functional status and well-being. However, no systematic reviews have summarized the studies that investigate the measurement properties of diabetes PROMs. Objective Our aims were to conduct a systematic review of studies investigating the measurement properties of diabetes PROMs by evaluating the methodological quality and overall level of evidence of these PROMs and to categorize them based on the outcome measures assessed. Methods This study was guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. Relevant articles were retrieved from the Embase, PubMed, and PsychINFO databases. The PROMs were evaluated with the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments) guidelines. Results A total of 363 articles evaluating the measurement properties of PROMs for diabetes in the adult population were identified, of which 238 unique PROMs from 248 studies reported in 209 articles were validated in the type 2 diabetes population. PROMs with at least a moderate level of evidence for ≥5 of 9 measurement properties include the Chinese version of the Personal Diabetes Questionnaire (C-PDQ), Diabetes Self-Management Instrument Short Form (DSMI-20), and Insulin Treatment Appraisal Scale in Hong Kong primary care patients (C-ITAS-HK), of which the C-PDQ has a “sufficient (+)” rating for >4 measurement properties. A total of 43 PROMs meet the COSMIN guidelines for recommendation for use. Conclusions This study identified and synthesized evidence for the measurement properties of 238 unique PROMs for patients with type 2 diabetes and categorized the PROMs according to their outcome measures. These findings may assist clinicians and researchers in selecting appropriate high-quality PROMs for clinical practice and research. Trial Registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020180978; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020180978.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review

Wee¹,

Kwan²,

Loh³

et al. 2021

J Med Internet Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Menurut Profil Kesehatan Provinsi Bali 2018 menunjukkan bahwa persentase penderita DM pada Kabupaten Buleleng mendapatkan pelayanan kesehatan sesuai standar (100%) dan mengalami penurunan menjadi 73,28% pada tahun 2020 (Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Bali, 2021). Penurunan cakupan pelayanan tersebut dapat menjadi salah satu penyebab kurangnya pengetahuan penderita DM tentang manajemen penyakit secara mandiri dengan benar (Padhy et al, 2019). Kurangnya pengetahuan dapat mempengaruhi perilaku dalam manajemen DM menjadi cenderung kurang optimal dan memicu peningkatan angka kesakitan (Padhy et al, 2019).…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

“…Penurunan cakupan pelayanan tersebut dapat menjadi salah satu penyebab kurangnya pengetahuan penderita DM tentang manajemen penyakit secara mandiri dengan benar (Padhy et al, 2019). Kurangnya pengetahuan dapat mempengaruhi perilaku dalam manajemen DM menjadi cenderung kurang optimal dan memicu peningkatan angka kesakitan (Padhy et al, 2019). Menurut Profil Kesehatan Kabupaten Buleleng 2019 menyatakan bahwa terdapat peningkatan angka kejadian DM pada tahun 2019 hingga tahun 2020 (Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Buleleng, 2020; Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Buleleng, 2021).…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Gambaran Tingkat Digital Health Literacy Penderita Diabetes Melitus Di Puskesmas Buleleng I Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19

Dewi¹,

Rahajeng²,

Suarningsih³

et al. 2022

COPING

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The COVID-19 pandemic has been challenging for people with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) in accessing health services in Indonesia. The increase in the incidence of DM during the COVID-19 pandemic occurred in Buleleng Regency, especially the Community Health Center Buleleng I. The government recommends using information technology for DM self-management. The ability to access technology and health information in DM self-management can be projected from the level of digital health literacy. This study aims to describe the level of digital health literacy among DM patients at the Community Health Center Buleleng I during the COVID-19 pandemic. This was a descriptive study with a survey approach. Respondents as many as 67 people selected by consecutive sampling technique. Data was analysed using descriptive statistical analysis. The results show the level of digital health literacy low (50,7%). The characteristic of the respondents are the age range of 57-66 years (32,8%), male (31,3%), have been living with DM for 1-5 years (41,4%), and monthly income below average (47,8%).

show abstract

Diabetes Mellitus Knowledge Test: development, psychometric evaluation, and establishing norms for Indian population

Cited by 2 publications

References 24 publications

Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review

Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review

Gambaran Tingkat Digital Health Literacy Penderita Diabetes Melitus Di Puskesmas Buleleng I Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About