2019
DOI: 10.15605/jafes.034.02.09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diabetes-Related Attitudes of Health Care Providers in Rural Health Centers in Aklan, Philippines using the Filipino version of Diabetes Attitude Scale (DAS-3)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study by De la Cruz et al. (2019) using the DAS3 was administered to 339 health care providers in the Philippines. The health care professionals ranked the subscales from the highest need areas to the lowest: Need for Specialized Training, Patient Autonomy, Psychosocial Impact of DM, Value of Tight Control, and Seriousness of NIDDM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent study by De la Cruz et al. (2019) using the DAS3 was administered to 339 health care providers in the Philippines. The health care professionals ranked the subscales from the highest need areas to the lowest: Need for Specialized Training, Patient Autonomy, Psychosocial Impact of DM, Value of Tight Control, and Seriousness of NIDDM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The health care professionals ranked the subscales from the highest need areas to the lowest: Need for Specialized Training, Patient Autonomy, Psychosocial Impact of DM, Value of Tight Control, and Seriousness of NIDDM. More than 50% of the health care responders were barangay health workers, often referred to as Community Health Workers (De la Cruz et al., 2019). The health care professionals from the Philippines, previous research involving nursing students (Williamson et al., 1996), and pharmacists from Bosnia and Herzegovina (Catic et al., 2019) indicated survey participants agree that caring for patients with diabetes requires specialized training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a study by Polubriaginof et al [ 31 ] reported that among the eligible-for-screening cohort, 30.6% of the participants did not receive diabetes screening based on current recommendations, and that having more than 1 family member affected by diabetes increased the likelihood of screening. Furthermore, in a study in rural health centers in Aklan in the Philippines, healthcare professionals had neutral diabetes-attitude scale scores and they believed that special training was needed for type 2 diabetes [ 32 ]. In combination with the results of Edelman et al [ 33 ] who reported that having a primary care provider did not raise or lower the risk for undiagnosed diabetes in screened patients for diabetes, the aforementioned findings could show that healthcare providers’ knowledge of the importance of diabetes screening does not guarantee that they provide advice on screening or that patients adhere to screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%