Diachronic Problems in Phonosymbolism

Malkiel, Yakov

doi:10.1075/z.eai1

Cited by 44 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Imitative words have always been a challenge to etymologists as they are notorious for 'disobeying' regular sound changes, hypervariation, and ambiguous form similarity (which can be interpreted both as genetic relation and independent semblance), nevertheless, successfully tracing down their history has been proven possible (see e.g. -Joseph 1997: 1-26;Koleva-Zlateva 2008;Levitsky 2000;Liberman 2010;Malkiel 1990), and their phonetic 'irregularity' has been described and accounted for (Brodovich 2008: 485-489;Durkin 2009: 127;Flaksman 2015: 157;Hock 1986: 50).…”

Section: Imitative Words In Indo-european Languagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

From ie *u̯e to English window: on the age and number of imitative words in English

Flaksman¹

2019

IELCP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article is devoted to the study of imitative (iconic, onomatopoeic, sound symbolic) words from the diachronic perspective. The main questions discussed are the number of imitated words in the lexicon and their age. The material for the study includes 1500 Modern English and 300 Old English onomatopoeic and sound symbolic words selected by continuous sampling from relevant etymological dictionaries. Examples are drawn from other languages of the Indo-European family-Gothic, Old Norse, Icelandic, German, Russian and other. The main conclusion of the article is that imitative words existing in modern languages are not likely to be old coinages, which suggests that the historical-comparative reconstruction of onomatopoeic and sound symbolic roots should be conducted with great caution.

show abstract

Section: Imitative Words In Indo-european Languagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

From ie *u̯e to English window: on the age and number of imitative words in English

Flaksman¹

2019

IELCP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Despite the continuous appearance of books and articles on onomatopoeia in various languages (see the paragraph above), most of these works deal with the synchronous level of language, rarely taking into account diachronic problems of onomatopoeia (outstanding exceptions to this tendency see -Brodovich, 2008;Joseph, 1997;Liberman, 2010;Malkiel, 1990). Yet diachronic approach gives a new insight into the nature of onomatopoeia.…”

Section: Problem Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Onomatopoeia and Regular Sound Changes

Flaksman¹

2018

J. Sib. Fed. Univ., Humanit. soc. sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article deals with the problem of diachronic development of onomatopoeic lexicon and discusses how regular sound changes affect imitative words. The classification according to the degrees of the impact of regular sound changes is devised and applied to the bulk of English sound-imitative words. The aim of the article is to establish which regular sound changes of the English language had the most detrimental effect. In order to achieve this aim, all major English regular sound changes are classified into phonosemantically significant and phonosemantically insignificant. This classification is based on the use of methods of historical-comparative linguistics and etymological analysis. The main result is the revelation of the fact that not all regular sound changes are equally detrimental to the iconic lexicon of a language. They are only so if: 1) touch upon salient, meaning-bearing phonemes of an iconic word; 2) change the original phonotype of a phoneme; and 3) take place when the word still retains its original sound-meaning coherence. The devised classification is potentially universal and applicable to the onomatopoeic lexicons of related and unrelated languages.

show abstract

“…Précisons que la submorphémique lexicale s'intéresse également, de façon non restrictive, au phonosymbolisme (cf. Jespersen 1922, Genette 1976, Fónagy 1983, Malkiel 1990, Hinton et al 1994, Humboldt 1999 Chadelat dans ce numéro), à l'iconicité submorphémique (cf. Mannheim 1991, Waugh 1993, Waugh & Newfield 1995, Nuckolls 1996, et Philps dans ce numéro), à la formation lexicale (cf.…”

“…Among other topics, lexical submorphemics addresses areas such as sound symbolism (see Jespersen 1922, Fónagy 1983, Malkiel 1990, Hinton et al 1994, Genette 1995, Humboldt 1999, and Chadelat, this issue), submorphemic iconicity (see Mannheim 1991, Waugh 1993, Waugh & Newfield 1995, Nuckolls 1996, and Philps, this issue), word-formation (see Adams 1973, Bauer 1983, Plag 2003, and cognition (see Bottineau 2002, Philps 2006, as well as Argoud and Bottineau, this issue).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction

Philps¹

2008

lexis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Diachronic Problems in Phonosymbolism

Cited by 44 publications

References 0 publications

From ie *u̯e to English window: on the age and number of imitative words in English

From ie *u̯e to English window: on the age and number of imitative words in English

Onomatopoeia and Regular Sound Changes

Introduction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About