Fontes Linguae Vasconum 50 Urte. Ekarpen Berriak Euskararen Ikerketari / Nuevas Aportaciones Al Estudio De La Lengua 2020
DOI: 10.35462/fontes50urte.28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diachronical hypotheses accounting for synchronic variation: the case of the Basque particle ote

Abstract: Two modal particles in Basque display separate syntactic statuses in eastern dialects, namely the evidential omen and the epistemic ote. Despite works on their syntax, no attempt to explain the relation (and development) between the two statuses has been put forward. After concluding that analyses on German and Italian MPs (Grosz, 2005;Coniglio, 2007;Cardinaletti, 2011) are not appropriate for omen/ote, I demonstrate that the recent proposal of Lakarra ( 2019), who postulates that MPs derive from verbs, accoun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…its behaviour in non-inflected contexts and in those where the finite verb moves along the sentence, and 33 One could point out that the evolution of the syntactic status of ote seems inconsistent, since it turns from a head one into a phrasal one and further from a phrasal one into a head one again. Nevertheless, I follow the hypothesis put forth in Monforte (2020a) that the ote2 does not derive directly from the canonical ote (dealt in Section 3), but from a paratactic clause (Schoonjans 2012;Van Bogaert & Leuschner 2015). This grammaticalization process is not unknown in the Basque language since other particles or epistemic adverbs seem to share a similar evolution; for instance:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…its behaviour in non-inflected contexts and in those where the finite verb moves along the sentence, and 33 One could point out that the evolution of the syntactic status of ote seems inconsistent, since it turns from a head one into a phrasal one and further from a phrasal one into a head one again. Nevertheless, I follow the hypothesis put forth in Monforte (2020a) that the ote2 does not derive directly from the canonical ote (dealt in Section 3), but from a paratactic clause (Schoonjans 2012;Van Bogaert & Leuschner 2015). This grammaticalization process is not unknown in the Basque language since other particles or epistemic adverbs seem to share a similar evolution; for instance:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%