2017
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis and management of endometriosis: a systematic review of international and national guidelines

Abstract: There is substantial variation in the recommendations and methodological quality of endometriosis guidelines. Future guidelines should be developed with reference to high-quality methods in consultation with key stakeholders, including women with endometriosis, ensuring that their scope can truly inform clinical practice and eliminate unwarranted and unjustified variations in clinical practice. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: #Endometriosis guidelines vary in recommendations and quality. @EndometriosisUK.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
66
0
8

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
66
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, several studies show variable and overall low levels of adherence to guidelines, particularly in obstetrics . Substantial work has gone into standardising and improving the methods used to synthesise the available scientific evidence and to develop guideline content . By contrast, the subsequent steps of guideline dissemination and implementation have received less attention and remain challenging …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, several studies show variable and overall low levels of adherence to guidelines, particularly in obstetrics . Substantial work has gone into standardising and improving the methods used to synthesise the available scientific evidence and to develop guideline content . By contrast, the subsequent steps of guideline dissemination and implementation have received less attention and remain challenging …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] Substantial work has gone into standardising and improving the methods used to synthesise the available scientific evidence and to develop guideline content. [5][6][7] By contrast, the subsequent steps of guideline dissemination and implementation have received less attention and remain challenging. 8 The literature discusses several hypotheses intended to explain these low adherence rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other biomarkers, such as CA-125 and CA-19-9, have also been analysed in patients with endometriosis (6). However, no biomarkers were considered to be useful for the diagnosis of endometriosis (6,41). The usefulness of AXIN1 as a biomarker has to be further examined, independently of other biomarkers.…”
Section: Axin1 Pg/ml Hs-crp Mg/l ----------------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is substantial variation in the recommendations and methodologic quality of the guidelines for endometriosis, many guidelines agree that this chronic condition requires long-term medical treatment despite the availability of surgical management options 1,2,[12][13][14] . The management of symptoms is the primary goal of treatment for endometriosis 1,15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%