Approximately one-half of the world's population is reported to be infected with Helicobacter pylori [1], a cause of numerous gastrointestinal diseases including gastric or duodenal ulcers, gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, and gastric cancer [2,3]. Eradication of H. pylori is the first option for the treatment of low-grade gastric MALT lymphoma. Furthermore, H. pylori eradication reduces the recurrence of peptic ulcer [4]. A recent Cochrane review reported that the risk of gastric cancer may be reduced through H. pylori eradication, particularly in Asia [5].Despite recent updates regarding the advantages of H. pylori eradication, the decline in the H. pylori eradication rate following treatment with conventional antibiotic regimens [proton pump inhibitor (PPI) ? amoxicillin ? clarithromycin, twice daily for 1-2 weeks] is of concern for gastroenterologists. To increase the eradication rate, the efficacy of several regimens has been compared in clinical trials [6]. In Korea, for example, [40 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of first-line H. pylori eradication regimens have been completed [7]; in a network metaanalysis of H. pylori eradication in Korea, where both H. pylori infection and gastric cancer are highly prevalent, alternative regimens such as sequential, hybrid, and concomitant therapies (sequential therapy: PPI and amoxicillin, twice daily for the first 5 days (or 7 days), thereafter PPI, clarithromycin, and metronidazole (or tinidazole), twice daily for the last 5 days (or 7 days); hybrid therapy: PPI and amoxicillin, twice daily for the first 5 days (or 7 days), thereafter PPI, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole, twice daily for the next 5 days (or 7 days); concomitant therapy: PPI, amoxicillin, clarithromycin and metronidazole, twice daily for 5-14 days) reported higher eradication rates than did conventional triple therapy [7]. Since most PPI-based regimens, including alternative regimens, failed to achieve acceptable eradication rates [7], regimens incorporating the potent potassium-competitive antisecretory drug vonoprazan rather than PPIs have been developed in an effort to improve the eradication rate [7][8][9].In this issue of Digestive Diseases and Sciences, Tanabe et al. [8] reported their ''real-world'' experience regarding vonoprazan-based H. pylori eradication therapy. In their study, the eradication rates of first-line and second-line vonoprazan-based triple therapy (first-line: 20 mg of vonoprazan, 750 mg of amoxicillin, and 200 mg (or 400 mg) of clarithromycin, twice daily for 1 week; second-line: 20 mg of vonoprazan, 750 mg of amoxicillin, 250 mg of metronidazole, twice daily for 1 week) in per-protocol (PP) analysis in populations untested for antibiotic sensitivity were 94.4 and 97.1%, respectively. The eradication rate for first-line vonoprazan-based triple therapy in their study was comparable to or even higher than that reported in a recent metaanalysis of vonoprazan-based triple therapy [89.2% (95% confidence interval, 86.1-91.7%) in PP ana...