2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic abilities of magnetic resonance imaging in traumatic injury to the posterior ligamentous complex: the effect of years in training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, ligamentous disruption is best appreciated on fat-suppressed sequences like T 2 and short tau inversion-recovery owing to suppression of the background fatty signal, rendering the abnormal high fluid signal more obvious. 23 Disruption of the PLC was found to be one of the good criteria for Full paper: Imaging findings of flexion hangman's fracture BJR predicting flexion; however, some non-flexion cases in this series also showed a degree of PLC disruption, a finding which may be related to two factors. Firstly, cases showing no flexion on lateral radiographs may originally have had a flexion vector of injury and come to rest in a neutral position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In general, ligamentous disruption is best appreciated on fat-suppressed sequences like T 2 and short tau inversion-recovery owing to suppression of the background fatty signal, rendering the abnormal high fluid signal more obvious. 23 Disruption of the PLC was found to be one of the good criteria for Full paper: Imaging findings of flexion hangman's fracture BJR predicting flexion; however, some non-flexion cases in this series also showed a degree of PLC disruption, a finding which may be related to two factors. Firstly, cases showing no flexion on lateral radiographs may originally have had a flexion vector of injury and come to rest in a neutral position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Recently, Javier et al [17] reported that in a prospective study performed using a standard MRI sequencing protocol including patients who have received conservative treatment, the sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 91 and 100 %, respectively. Crosby et al [2], however, reported the sensitivity and specificity of MRI for the injury in the posterior ligament complex to be lower: 83-89 % and 37-58 %, respectively. In this study, the sensitivity and specificity of MRI for the injury in the posterior ligament complex were 70.8 and 100 % when indeterminate cases were included in the intact group, and 99.1 and 48.8 % when indeterminate cases were included in the ruptured group, showing a large difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the injury in the posterior ligament complex (PLC), one of the most important elements contributing to the soft tissue especially to the stability of the spine, has depended on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for its diagnosis. There is no doubt that MRI is the most accurate diagnosis method in assessing soft-tissue injuries [9,13,17], but according to the papers published to date, the sensitivity and specificity of MRI for diagnosing the posterior ligament complex injury in the thoracolumbar junction have been reported to be within the ranges of 79.2-100 % and 56-100 %, respectively [2,4,5,12,19,21,24]. Therefore, there is a limitation in using MRI as a single test to make a diagnosis of the injury in the posterior ligament complex and to determine the appropriate treatment method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4]. Thoracolumbar injury classification and severity scores (TLICS) [5] of all cases were calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%