1965
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1965.01600110083017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Accuracy— A New Approach to Its Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average test results over 18 trials from all the α-cuts cases yield tp rates of greater than 86.0% and tn rates of greater than 77.0%. These results are close to the diagnostic sensitivity reported for unaided dermatologist observers [1][2][3]5]. Third, the experimental results demonstrate that the fuzzy logic-based histogram analysis technique can be successfully applied to differentiating melanoma from benign skin lesions in clinical images.…”
Section: Fuzzy Ratio Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The average test results over 18 trials from all the α-cuts cases yield tp rates of greater than 86.0% and tn rates of greater than 77.0%. These results are close to the diagnostic sensitivity reported for unaided dermatologist observers [1][2][3]5]. Third, the experimental results demonstrate that the fuzzy logic-based histogram analysis technique can be successfully applied to differentiating melanoma from benign skin lesions in clinical images.…”
Section: Fuzzy Ratio Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…A significant number of malignant melanomas, especially early melanomas curable by excision, are not diagnosed correctly in the clinical setting [1][2][3][4]. The diagnostic sensitivity reported for unaided dermatologist observers ranges from a low of about 66% to about 81% [1][2][3]5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results show that although the diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination was not 100 %, the likelihood of providing the correct treatment for these tumours was indeed very high. Our study also demonstrated a remarkable improvement in clinical diagnosis of BCC compared to previous retrospective studies that reported misdiagnosis in 25 % of the lesions [6,7]. An analogous improvement in the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma based on clinical findings was noticed as previous studies have shown that 36 % of squamous cell carcinomas were misdiagnosed clinically as basal cell carcinomas [6,7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This seems more accurate than data obtained by clinical judgement alone. We (6) and others (2,7,8) have indeed noted that the diagnosis made by experienced cli nicians was confirmed histologically only in 2/3 of the cases. In our series, the clinical ac curacy was less than 50% for general practi tioners, about 60% for surgeons and 85% for dermatologists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%