2018
DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.117.007217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Accuracy of a Machine-Learning Approach to Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography–Based Fractional Flow Reserve

Abstract: On-site CT-FFR based on ML improves the performance of CTA by correctly reclassifying hemodynamically nonsignificant stenosis and performs equally well as CFD-based CT-FFR.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
179
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 338 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
9
179
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, ML has proven itself to be a vastly more powerful tool for prediction across several cardiovascular applications. [27][28][29][30][31] The addition of CACS to prediction models has been previously shown to improve performance; similarly, our findings show that the best prediction was achieved with the addition of CACS to the ML model. 11,15,32 For instance, the addition of the CACS to extended CAD consortium clinical score was found to significantly increase the C-statistic from 0.79 to 0.88 for the prediction of obstructive CAD on invasive coronary angiography.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Further, ML has proven itself to be a vastly more powerful tool for prediction across several cardiovascular applications. [27][28][29][30][31] The addition of CACS to prediction models has been previously shown to improve performance; similarly, our findings show that the best prediction was achieved with the addition of CACS to the ML model. 11,15,32 For instance, the addition of the CACS to extended CAD consortium clinical score was found to significantly increase the C-statistic from 0.79 to 0.88 for the prediction of obstructive CAD on invasive coronary angiography.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The currently available work-in-progress on-site CT-FFR software works on a regular workstation using semi-automated 3D coronary artery modeling and 1 of the following algorithms: (1) the reduced-order CFD-based FFR calculations; 13,14 (2) CFD-based FFR calculations with an AI algorithm, 15 or (3) ML-based CT-FFR calculations. [17][18][19] The most recently developed on-site ML-based CT-FFR algorithm was developed using a deep learning model to integrate the complex relationship between various anatomic features and the CFD-based FFR results as the ground truth from a synthetically generated database of 12,000 coronary artery models. Abbreviations as in Table 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By only performing CFD simulations once in a training phase, the time required to perform FFR CT was reduced by two orders of magnitude. The diagnostic value of this method has been demonstrated thoroughly (64)(65)(66)(67)(68)(69)(70)(71)(72)(73)(74)(75)(76). Yu…”
Section: Functional Significancementioning
confidence: 99%