Diagnostic accuracy of nasal cannula versus microphone for detection of snoring

Warnisher, María Teresa Pérez; Gómez-García, Teresa; Cadavid, Luis Fernando Giraldo; Acevedo, María Fernanda Troncoso; Rodríguez, Paula; Miguel, Pilar Carballosa De; Mangado, Nicolás González

doi:10.1002/lary.26710

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, we confirmed the results of previous studies that showed that snore measurements should be audio‐based, and suggested that the use of the cannula as a snore sensor be discontinued (Arnardottir et al, 2016; Pérez‐Warnisher et al, 2017) even if this measurement is linked to subjective loudness of snoring to some degree. The significant positive correlation between percentage of objective snoring and both nasal MCA and corrected nasopharyngeal volume is another argument that nasal obstruction is a bias for snoring frequency assessment.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Reliability of parental reporting of child snoring in children referred for obstructive sleep apnea

Bokov

Dudoignon

Spruyt

et al. 2023

Journal of Sleep Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryDespite the high number of studies based on subjective reports of snoring, self‐reported snoring has hardly been validated at all. As there is no “gold‐standard” for objective snoring measurements, studies must evaluate whether the presence of snoring based on parental judgement is linked to objective measurements of nasal and/or pharyngeal obstruction in children referred for obstructive sleep apnea. A total of 146 children (median age 11 years) underwent polysomnography (with snoring recording using nasal cannula signal), acoustic rhinometry and pharyngometry, while their parents filled out the Spruyt–Gozal questionnaire assessing both frequency and loudness of subjective snoring. Three categories were further differentiated (null, low and high) for both frequency and loudness. The apnea–hypopnea index was significantly different in the three groups for both frequency (p = 0.04) and loudness (p = 0.01) of subjective snoring. Children in the low or high groups (frequency or loudness), compared with those in the null group, experienced a decline in both pharyngeal (sitting and supine positions) and nasopharyngeal (supine position) volumes (frequency, pharynx sitting: p = 0.03; supine: 0.005 and nasopharynx: p = 0.002; loudness, p = 0.03; p = 0.007 and p = 0.03; three group comparisons). Objective snoring frequency during the night obtained with cannula was weakly related to loudness of subjective snoring but not to subjective snoring frequency during the week, and was biased by nasal obstruction. In conclusion, our study showed that parental assessment of snoring is related to a reduction in both pharyngeal and nasopharyngeal volumes in snorers, arguing for the adequacy of their evaluation of both snoring frequency and loudness.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Reliability of parental reporting of child snoring in children referred for obstructive sleep apnea

Bokov

Dudoignon

Spruyt

et al. 2023

Journal of Sleep Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…En la presente investigación no es clara la coincidencia entre los datos reportados por los pacientes (subjetivos) y la aplicación móvil, en la disminución de los eventos de ronquido comparada con los resultados registrados por la polisomnografía. Estos resultados coinciden con la investigación de Hofstein, 21 quien concluyó que la percepción de los ronquidos era muy subjetiva y especuló que las investigaciones que estudiaran las consecuencias y el tratamiento del ronquido, debían emplear métodos más sofisticados y debidamente validados para medir el ronquido o, alternativamente, recurrir a mediciones de las anomalías fisiológicas subyacentes responsables del ronquido, como las elevaciones de la resistencia de las vías respiratorias superiores. Estos procedimientos que no se realizaron en el presente trabajo.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Ronquido, Eventos Respiratorios y Cardíacos Después de la Colocación de un Dispositivo de Avance Mandibular

Aristizabal-Hoyos¹,

Soto²,

Mulett-Vásquez³

et al. 2021

revecuatneurol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivo: Comparar los niveles de ronquido, como síntomas o predecesores de la Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño (AOS), antes y después de la colocación de un nuevo dispositivo de avance mandibular (DAM), colocado como opción para el control de los mecanismos patológicos respiratorios del sueño que se han asociado con disfunciones cognitivas, somnolencia diurna excesiva y como un agravante del desarrollo del Alzheimer y del Parkinson. Metodología: Estudio de serie de casos que consideró 12 adultos roncadores identificados inicialmente con el App Roncolab®. Se realizó historia clínica del sueño y polisomnografía (PSG) inicial (A) y final de control (D). Se colocó un nuevo diseño de DAM que se revisó cada 20 días durante dos meses. Se analizaron parámetros neurofisiológicos, cardiopulmonares y del sueño. Las diferencias estadísticas entre las variables se establecieron según la distribución de los datos con pruebas de t-student o U de Mann-Whitney. Resultados: El promedio de eventos de ronquido según PSG fueron (A: D: 260) con p>0,05; según el Roncolab® (A: 73.6; D: 22.6) con un p <0,05. No hubo diferencias entre los promedios de oximetría (A: 0.84; D: 0.83) ni frecuencia cardíaca (A: 65; D: 66.9). Conclusiones: A corto plazo no hubo diferencia estadísticamente significativa después de la colocación del DAM en los eventos respiratorios y cardíacos, la oximetría ni en los episodios de apnea según PSG. El Roncolab® registró disminución significativa de los eventos de ronquido. Palabras clave: Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño, Disfunciones cognitivas, Férulas oclusales, Ronquido

show abstract

Automated sleep apnea detection from snoring and carotid pulse signals using an innovative neck wearable piezoelectric sensor

Chao,

Chuang,

et al. 2025

Measurement

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Diagnostic accuracy of nasal cannula versus microphone for detection of snoring

Abstract: 2b. Laryngoscope, 127:2886-2890, 2017.

Cited by 5 publications

References 18 publications

Reliability of parental reporting of child snoring in children referred for obstructive sleep apnea

Reliability of parental reporting of child snoring in children referred for obstructive sleep apnea

Ronquido, Eventos Respiratorios y Cardíacos Después de la Colocación de un Dispositivo de Avance Mandibular

Automated sleep apnea detection from snoring and carotid pulse signals using an innovative neck wearable piezoelectric sensor

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About