2021
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.617277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers for Myocardial Infarction

Abstract: The incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) increases every year worldwide. Better diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for clinical applications are the consistent pursuit of MI research. In addition to electrocardiogram, echocardiography, coronary angiography, etc., circulating biomarkers are essential for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment effect monitoring of MI patients. In this review, we assessed both strength and weakness of MI circulating biomarkers including: (1) originated from damaged myocardi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
40
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
1
40
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these two datasets had only four and eight experimental group samples, which may cause some errors and bias. Currently, the urgent need for early detection, early diagnosis, and timely treatment of MI for the relatively low sensitivity and specificity cannot be met by existing serum markers (cTn, MB, and CK-MB) [ 34 ]. It was revealed in the results of this study that the area under the ROC curve was over 0.5, indicating that TLR2 expression has a particular diagnostic value for MI, and the total AUC of the sROC curve was 0.78.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these two datasets had only four and eight experimental group samples, which may cause some errors and bias. Currently, the urgent need for early detection, early diagnosis, and timely treatment of MI for the relatively low sensitivity and specificity cannot be met by existing serum markers (cTn, MB, and CK-MB) [ 34 ]. It was revealed in the results of this study that the area under the ROC curve was over 0.5, indicating that TLR2 expression has a particular diagnostic value for MI, and the total AUC of the sROC curve was 0.78.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New risk markers can significantly improve survival of patients who are at high risk despite reperfusion therapy that others have demonstrated for the identification of subgroups of patients at greater risk. 11 Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is a powerful risk marker after acute myocardial infarction (MI). Reliable data on RV damage using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are scarce.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study using a rat model of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity, treatment with α-mangostin (100 and 200 mg/kg) was suggested to improve electrocardiograph recordings, heart/body weight ratio and histological structures, increase systolic blood pressure, decrease MdA levels, improved the GSH level and normalize creatine kinase-MB (cK-MB) levels and lactate dehydrogenase (LdH) compared to doxorubicin-treated (dOX) rats (95). cK-MB detection in serum is a sensitive indicator in the early stages of cardiac damage, whereas LdH levels will increase when further cardiac damage occurs (96,97). As previously demonstrated, α-mangostin (100 mg/kg) reduced the ratio of Bax/Bcl-2 as compared to dOX in heart tissues.…”
Section: Cardioprotective and Anti-atherogenic Effects Of α-Mangostinmentioning
confidence: 99%