2018
DOI: 10.2478/jccm-2018-0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic pitfalls in identification of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This isolate was reclassified as E. meningoseptica in the same study that misidentified E. miricola isolate CIP108653 as E. meningoseptica based on 16S rRNA sequences (Bernardet et al., 2005). Given the changes in nomenclature and the sometimes challenging identification of Elizabethkingia isolates (de Carvalho Filho, Marson, & Levy, 2017; Han et al., 2016; Matyi, Hoyt, Ayoubi‐Canaan, Hasan, & Gustafson, 2015; Rahim, Gupta, & Aggarwal, 2018), it cannot be excluded that some historic descriptions of bacterial infections similar to the condition described here (Chung, 1990; Green et al, 1999; Mauel, Miller, Frazier, & Hines, 2002; Olson, Gard, Brown, Hampton, & Morck, 1992; Taylor, Simmonds, & Loeffler, 1993) are in fact related to E. miricola infection. This would make E. miricola a more important amphibian pathogen than previously thought.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This isolate was reclassified as E. meningoseptica in the same study that misidentified E. miricola isolate CIP108653 as E. meningoseptica based on 16S rRNA sequences (Bernardet et al., 2005). Given the changes in nomenclature and the sometimes challenging identification of Elizabethkingia isolates (de Carvalho Filho, Marson, & Levy, 2017; Han et al., 2016; Matyi, Hoyt, Ayoubi‐Canaan, Hasan, & Gustafson, 2015; Rahim, Gupta, & Aggarwal, 2018), it cannot be excluded that some historic descriptions of bacterial infections similar to the condition described here (Chung, 1990; Green et al, 1999; Mauel, Miller, Frazier, & Hines, 2002; Olson, Gard, Brown, Hampton, & Morck, 1992; Taylor, Simmonds, & Loeffler, 1993) are in fact related to E. miricola infection. This would make E. miricola a more important amphibian pathogen than previously thought.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%