2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic specificity of a real-time RT-PCR in cattle for foot-and-mouth disease and swine for foot-and-mouth disease and classical swine fever based on non-invasive specimen collection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comprehensive recent study of specificity of this method confirmed a very high specificity, but even with the inconclusive reactions considered false-positives, the specificity was 99.9%, which may provide enough accuracy for a diagnosis during an outbreak, but may not be specific enough for surveillance in FMDfree areas (23). The finding that 4 samples failed to yield a C T value throws doubt on the provenance of the tested material, because stored cell culturegrown antigens to four of the isolates readily reacted in the rRT-PCR which had a nucleotide substitution in the probe site, enabling it to escape recognition by the routine diagnostic probe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A comprehensive recent study of specificity of this method confirmed a very high specificity, but even with the inconclusive reactions considered false-positives, the specificity was 99.9%, which may provide enough accuracy for a diagnosis during an outbreak, but may not be specific enough for surveillance in FMDfree areas (23). The finding that 4 samples failed to yield a C T value throws doubt on the provenance of the tested material, because stored cell culturegrown antigens to four of the isolates readily reacted in the rRT-PCR which had a nucleotide substitution in the probe site, enabling it to escape recognition by the routine diagnostic probe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, samples from the area free of FMD, which were properly stored, were all negative by real-time RT-PCR as well as by virus isolation and ELISA, indicating a high specificity of this test as previously demonstrated [ 12 ]. A comprehensive recent study of specificity of this method confirmed a very high specificity, but even with the inconclusive reactions considered false-positives, the specificity was 99.9%, which may provide enough accuracy for a diagnosis during an outbreak, but may not be specific enough for surveillance in FMD-free areas [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional RT-PCR and real-time RT-PCR have been widely used to specifically detect FMDV [ 19 , 20 ]. The purpose of this assay was to estimate the binding target virus efficiency of MNBs by real-time RT-PCR and conventional RT-PCR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%