2007
DOI: 10.1136/emj.2006.037929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic utility of laboratory tests in septic arthritis

Abstract: Background: Septic arthritis remains a challenging diagnosis in which the doctor often relies on laboratory tests. Objective: To examine the diagnostic utility of three ancillary tests-namely, white blood cells (WBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and the WBC in the joint fluid (jWBC)-using likelihood ratios (LRs) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study at the Jacobi Medical Center. Medical charts of patients who had undergone arthrocentesis wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
95
1
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
95
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…If the threshold for diagnosing infection was decreased to greater than 10,700 cells/lL, the NPV increased to 99%, but the PPV was reduced to 62%. Interestingly, the WBC counts we observed in the acute postoperative period were nearer to those in septic arthritis of native knees [14]. Tests for %PMN and CRP were less valuable in diagnosing early infection, but both tests' optimal thresholds demonstrated high NPV (97% and 91%, respectively) and could potentially be used to rule out infection but are less useful in diagnosing infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…If the threshold for diagnosing infection was decreased to greater than 10,700 cells/lL, the NPV increased to 99%, but the PPV was reduced to 62%. Interestingly, the WBC counts we observed in the acute postoperative period were nearer to those in septic arthritis of native knees [14]. Tests for %PMN and CRP were less valuable in diagnosing early infection, but both tests' optimal thresholds demonstrated high NPV (97% and 91%, respectively) and could potentially be used to rule out infection but are less useful in diagnosing infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The value of laboratory examinations in the diagnosis of septic arthritis remains uncertain, especially for peripheral white blood cell count [4,9]. Synovial fluid analysis for cell count, Gram stain, and culture is the fundamental diagnostic tool for septic arthritis [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20] In the joint aspiration it is necessary, besides the direct analysis of the material, to evaluate the presence of leukocytes which usually results in a count above 50,000 cells/mm³ (75% of polymorphonuclear leukocytes), Gram staining method that is positive in 30 to 50% of the cases, synovial protein and glucose dosages below the serum levels, increase of lactate and culture that can be positive in 50 to 80% of cases. 21,22 Although many supplementary exams can be used to aid the diagnosis of septic arthritis, many studies demonstrate that none of the tests on their own was conclusive for the diagnosis of this disease, except for the Gram staining method and the positive culturing. 21 The treatment of septic arthritis is based on arthrotomy with direct lavage of the affected joint, followed by early and appropriate antibiotic therapy that is initially performed assuming the most likely etiologic agent, and subsequently modified according to the culture results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 Although many supplementary exams can be used to aid the diagnosis of septic arthritis, many studies demonstrate that none of the tests on their own was conclusive for the diagnosis of this disease, except for the Gram staining method and the positive culturing. 21 The treatment of septic arthritis is based on arthrotomy with direct lavage of the affected joint, followed by early and appropriate antibiotic therapy that is initially performed assuming the most likely etiologic agent, and subsequently modified according to the culture results. [22][23][24][25] More recent studies suggest that arthroscopy may be a less invasive alternative for the treatment of this disorder, as it can satisfactorily substitute arthrotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%