2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic value of neutrophil CD64 combined with CRP for neonatal sepsis: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CRP has been effectively used to diagnose sepsis initially, but its specificity decreases further later in the course as a result of chronically high levels [22] . CRP levels were considerably higher in sepsis caused by gram-negative bacterial infections than in sepsis caused by gram-positive infections, indicating a distinct immunomodulatory response [23] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…CRP has been effectively used to diagnose sepsis initially, but its specificity decreases further later in the course as a result of chronically high levels [22] . CRP levels were considerably higher in sepsis caused by gram-negative bacterial infections than in sepsis caused by gram-positive infections, indicating a distinct immunomodulatory response [23] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Given the biological complexity of sepsis, a strategy based on a panel of multiple biomarkers is likely to have more potential to meet the needs of an ideal diagnostic test than any single biomarker [2]. Thus, using combinations of previously identified biomarkers has been recently investigated to improve diagnosis accuracy [100][101][102][103]. For example, a recent meta-analysis concluded that the combined application of CRP and CD64 improved the accuracy of neonatal sepsis diagnosis [102].…”
Section: Emerging Research Into Diagnostic Biomarkers Of Sepsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, using combinations of previously identified biomarkers has been recently investigated to improve diagnosis accuracy [100][101][102][103]. For example, a recent meta-analysis concluded that the combined application of CRP and CD64 improved the accuracy of neonatal sepsis diagnosis [102]. Combining a panel of biomarkers together with clinical information may prove even more accurate [90,104].…”
Section: Emerging Research Into Diagnostic Biomarkers Of Sepsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to factors such as insufficient samples, maternal use of antibiotics, and antibiotic use before sampling, this method may give false negative results [4,5]. Various biomarkers, including C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), neutrophil CD64, interleukin-8, and interleukin-27, are used for sepsis diagnosis [6][7][8][9][10][11]. However, these biomarkers may also be elevated in noninfectious conditions such as premature rupture of membranes, fetal distress, dystocia, and perinatal asphyxia, resulting in false positive results and low specificity for neonatal sepsis [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%