2018
DOI: 10.14309/00000434-201810001-00796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Yield of a Conventional Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) and Two Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) Needles: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The yield of histology accuracy was significantly higher in the FNB group. The same results reached Iqbal et al [ 52 ] when two FNB needles (SharkCore, Medtronic and Acquire, Boston Scientific) and FNA needle (Echotip Cook) were compared. The diagnostic yield was much higher in the EUS-FNB group (96.0%/94.9%) than the EUS-FNA group (86.2%).…”
Section: Fnb Vs Fna For Liver Tumorssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The yield of histology accuracy was significantly higher in the FNB group. The same results reached Iqbal et al [ 52 ] when two FNB needles (SharkCore, Medtronic and Acquire, Boston Scientific) and FNA needle (Echotip Cook) were compared. The diagnostic yield was much higher in the EUS-FNB group (96.0%/94.9%) than the EUS-FNA group (86.2%).…”
Section: Fnb Vs Fna For Liver Tumorssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Another study presented by Fareha Iqbal et al . [2] also investigated the two EUS sampling methods. The diagnostic yield for EUS-FNB was overall better than the EUS-FNA needles (96% vs. 86.2%).…”
Section: Eus-guided Tissue Acquisition For Solid Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%