“…Their key features of non-invasiveness, atraumaticity, sensitivity, cost-efficiency and clinical transfer potential, make them in vivo diagnostic tools of primary interest, complementary to other clinical gold standard procedures such as histopathology. In vivo skin diffuse reflectance (DR) [9][10][11] and autofluorescence (AF) [4,5,[12][13][14] spectroscopies or the combination of both [15][16][17], and the use of multiple excitation wavelengths for a better diagnostic accuracy [18], have been widely investigated for their applicability to provide a complementary information about the structural and biochemical changes accompanying the development of pathologies in skin tissues. For example, bimodal analysis combining multiply excited AF and DR spectral characteristics [17,19] resulted in increased diagnostic accuracy compared to a single excitation-AF approach when discriminating three types of mice skin hyperplasia, or normal columnar epithelium vs high-grade cervical precancers [20].…”