Diagram comprehension ability of college students in an introductory biology course

Abstract

College biology courses commonly use diagrams to convey information. These visual representations are embedded in course materials with the expectation that students can comprehend and learn from them. Educational research, however, suggests that many students have difficulty understanding diagrams and the conventions (e.g., labels, arrows) they contain. The present study evaluates biology students’ ability to comprehend scientific diagrams and the diagram characteristics that affect this comprehension. Participants were students in a physiology course who completed a multiple-choice test of diagram comprehension ability (DCA) (Cromley JG, Perez TC, Fitzhugh SL, Newcombe NS, Wills TW, Tanaka JC. J Exp Educ 81: 511–537, 2013). We coded the conventions used in each test diagram and used these codes to capture the diagram characteristics of conventions and complexity. Descriptive analyses examine students’ ability to understand scientific diagrams and which diagram characteristics cause the most difficulty. We also compared groups with low and high DCA scores to evaluate how students at different levels of comprehension ability are affected by diagram characteristics. Results show relatively poor DCA; the average total test score was only 69.5%. The conventions used in a diagram also affected diagram comprehension, and results show students had the most difficulty comprehending diagrams using a letter or numbering system, where arbitrary letters/numbers were used to signify objects and diagrams using cut-outs that showed cross sections and magnified interior views. Additionally, students’ comprehension was higher on diagrams with higher complexity (i.e., more types of conventions used), potentially indicating students are able to take advantage of the supports that different conventions provide. Implications for instruction are identified.

Teacher Orchestration of Language and Gesture in Explaining Science Concepts in Images

“…The difficulties experienced by students in interpreting diagrams remain a prominent focus in science education research (Brandstetter et al, 2017;Kottmeyer et al, 2020;Kragten et al, 2015;Ruiz-Gallardo et al, 2019). Such difficulties are more common among educationally disadvantaged students from low socio-economic status (SES) backgrounds and/or whose first language is not the language of instruction (Bergey et al, 2015;Cromley et al, 2013;Nunes et al, 2017;Thomson et al, 2017).…”

Teaching Membrane Transport Concepts Using Flipped Teaching & Dramatizations

“…For some students, confusion can linger when differentiating between the types of passive and active membrane transport. Often students do not understand the diagrams that are presented in class, and new ways to teach students these concepts need to be developed (Kottmeyer et al, 2020). It is essential that students learn these fundamental concepts, for their own understanding and to be able to apply this knowledge to new discoveries and clinical cases (Goodman & Percy, 2005).…”