2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dialectal and gender differences in nasalance scores in a Japanese population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
41
2
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
41
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, no difference was observed between the male and female genders in both groups for the three texts, corroborating the findings of other studies in the literature (7,24,26) . However, verification of the data revealed a trend of higher nasalance scores in women from Minas Gerais state compared with those of men in the same group for the nasal-2 text, as observed in some studies with adult populations (14,17,25,29) . This tendency is justified by differences in the velopharyngeal sphincter mechanism and in the vocal tract length between the genders (9,14,17,21,24,28) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, no difference was observed between the male and female genders in both groups for the three texts, corroborating the findings of other studies in the literature (7,24,26) . However, verification of the data revealed a trend of higher nasalance scores in women from Minas Gerais state compared with those of men in the same group for the nasal-2 text, as observed in some studies with adult populations (14,17,25,29) . This tendency is justified by differences in the velopharyngeal sphincter mechanism and in the vocal tract length between the genders (9,14,17,21,24,28) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Dialectal influence on nasalance scores has been investigated by several authors worldwide; however, whereas some authors have found differences between the dialects investigated (15,24,25) , others have reported that this is not a significant factor (13,14,20,26) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations