2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2002.00223
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dialogue-Based Simulation For Cultural Awareness Training

Sodiq Adewole,
Erfaneh Gharavi,
Benjamin Shpringer
et al.

Abstract: Existing simulations designed for cultural and interpersonal skill training rely on pre-defined responses with a menu option selection interface. Using a multiple-choice interface and restricting trainees' responses may limit the trainees' ability to apply the lessons in real life situations. These systems, also rely on a simplistic evaluation model, where trainees' selected options are marked as either correct or incorrect. The model cannot capture sufficient information that could drive an adaptive feedback … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These probabilistic models require a good knowledge of the transition structure between the segments and also require careful pre-training to yield a competitive performance. This may not be practicable for online applications where data are acquired online [31], [40]. Parametric approaches model the distribution before and after the change based on maximum likelihood framework [41] while non-parametric methods [42] have been mostly limited to uni-variate data.…”
Section: Boundary Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These probabilistic models require a good knowledge of the transition structure between the segments and also require careful pre-training to yield a competitive performance. This may not be practicable for online applications where data are acquired online [31], [40]. Parametric approaches model the distribution before and after the change based on maximum likelihood framework [41] while non-parametric methods [42] have been mostly limited to uni-variate data.…”
Section: Boundary Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GCNN extends techniques such as Recursive Neural Networks (RNN) [65], [66] and Markov Chains [67], [68] while leveraging the powerful representation power of neural networks on graph structured data. Traditional deep learning models are well developed for spatial (CNN) [55], [69] and sequential (RNN) data [70] with little contribution on graph structured data. CNNs are used to learn representation on 2D spatial image data while RNNs learns to encode and represent sequential data.…”
Section: B Graph Convolutional Neural Network (Gcnn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, many natural interactions between objects can be represented as a graph with the relationship between the objects captured in the edges between the nodes of the graph. Graph Neural Networks (GNN) models are robust and generic enough to also accommodate spatial and sequence data [70], [71] by specifying the nature of the edge and node relationships.…”
Section: B Graph Convolutional Neural Network (Gcnn)mentioning
confidence: 99%