2018
DOI: 10.2298/abs180412032c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diatom diversity and ecological status of the Lasovacka and Lenovacka streams near Zajecar: Consideration of WFD implementation in Serbia

Abstract: The development and improvement of the monitoring system of rivers according to the requirements of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) is essential for all European states because assigning a wrong ecological status class (misclassification) to a water body can have significant economic consequences. In order to point out some of the key issues of WFD implementation in Serbia, we conducted a one-year study of the composition and abundance of diatoms in the phytobenthos in two streams, the Lasovačka and Lenova… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genera Gomphonema, Navicula, and Nitzschia were the most numerous in both investigated rivers. Previous studies have shown that these three genera are dominant in the epilithic community in the other rivers in Serbia (Andrejic et al 2012, Jakovljević et al 2016a, b, Vasiljević et al 2017, Ćirić et al 2018, as well as in similar river conditions in other countries (Seve & Goldstein 1981, Ní Chatháin & Harrington 2008, Lobo et al 2010, Sevindik & Kucuk 2016.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Genera Gomphonema, Navicula, and Nitzschia were the most numerous in both investigated rivers. Previous studies have shown that these three genera are dominant in the epilithic community in the other rivers in Serbia (Andrejic et al 2012, Jakovljević et al 2016a, b, Vasiljević et al 2017, Ćirić et al 2018, as well as in similar river conditions in other countries (Seve & Goldstein 1981, Ní Chatháin & Harrington 2008, Lobo et al 2010, Sevindik & Kucuk 2016.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%