2011
DOI: 10.1107/s1600536811009305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dicarbonyldichloridobis(trimethylphosphane)iron(II)–carbonyldichloridotris(trimethylphosphane)iron(II)–tetrahydrofuran (1/1/2)

Abstract: Key indicators: single-crystal X-ray study; T = 100 K; mean (C-C) = 0.004 Å; disorder in solvent or counterion; R factor = 0.034; wR factor = 0.081; data-toparameter ratio = 22.5.The asymmetric unit of the title crystal, [FeCl 2 (C 3 H 9 P) 3 -(CO)]Á[FeCl 2 (C 3 H 9 P) 2 (CO) 2 ]Á2C 4 H 8 O, contains half molecules of the two closely related Fe II complexes lying on mirror planes and a tetrahydrofuran solvent molecule, one C atom of which is disordered over two sets of sites with site occupancy factors 0.633 (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, isomer A is the first metal complex that features TP as a PPP pincer-type ligand . This behavior is, however, in accord with the expected binding mode of three phosphine donors to an octahedral monocarbonyl iron­(II) species . The two terminal phosphorus atoms P2 and P3 in isomer A (Figure ) are trans to each other with similar bond distances to the iron center (2.2547(9) Å for Fe1–P2 and 2.2422(9) Å for Fe1–P3), while the Fe1–P1 bond distance 2.1852(10) Å) is significantly shorter.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…As such, isomer A is the first metal complex that features TP as a PPP pincer-type ligand . This behavior is, however, in accord with the expected binding mode of three phosphine donors to an octahedral monocarbonyl iron­(II) species . The two terminal phosphorus atoms P2 and P3 in isomer A (Figure ) are trans to each other with similar bond distances to the iron center (2.2547(9) Å for Fe1–P2 and 2.2422(9) Å for Fe1–P3), while the Fe1–P1 bond distance 2.1852(10) Å) is significantly shorter.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%