2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2109.06314
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dichotomy results for eventually always hitting time statistics and almost sure growth of extremes

Abstract: Suppose (f, X , µ) is a measure preserving dynamical system and φ : X → Ê a measurable function. Consider the maximum process Mn := max{X1, . . . , Xn}, where Xi = φ • f i−1 is a time series of observations on the system. Suppose that (un) is a non-decreasing sequence of real numbers, such that µ(X1 > un) → 0. For certain dynamical systems, we obtain a zero-one measure dichotomy for µ(Mn ≤ un i.o.) depending on the sequence un. Specific examples are piecewise expanding interval maps including the Gauß map. For… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The works [94,98,105,111] study the recurrence problem when the lim sup in (4.2) is replaced by lim inf. In particular, [111] proves that for several expanding maps lim inf n→∞ n d (1) n (x, y) ln ln n exists for almost all y.…”
Section: Proof Takementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The works [94,98,105,111] study the recurrence problem when the lim sup in (4.2) is replaced by lim inf. In particular, [111] proves that for several expanding maps lim inf n→∞ n d (1) n (x, y) ln ln n exists for almost all y.…”
Section: Proof Takementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors would like to thank Tomas Persson for pointing out that Lebesgue measure statement stated in Example 1 can be concluded from Ref. [15] by a Fubini-based argument. The authors are very grateful to the anonymous referee for his/her valuable comments and suggestions, especially for pointing out that item (2) of Theorem 1.2 is valid in a wider setting and is a direct consequence of [15, Theorem 3.2] and [19, Proposition 1 and Theorem 5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%