Dichtigkeit von Wurzelkanalfüllungen mit GuttaFlow® und Resilon™ im Vergleich zur lateralen Kondensation

Kqiku, Lumnije; Miletić, Ivana; Gruber, Hans Jürgen; Anić, Ivica; Städtler, P

doi:10.1007/s10354-010-0790-5

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 31 publications

(29 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The competitive advantage of this material was supposed to be a monoblock with dentin [179][180][181], which unfortunately did not turn out to be true [182]. There has been dispute as to whether this material is more useful, as it has been recognized in some studies [168,178,184,194,211,215,216,230,[232][233][234][235][236][237][238][239][240][241][242][243][244][245], or whether gutta-percha provides the best filling and tightness in the root canal [160,[194][195][196][197][198][199][200][201][202][203][204][205][206][207], especially after a longer time [208,209]. Many other evaluations and research results showed, and many dentists still believe, that Resilon cannot compete with gutta-percha.…”

Section: Summary and Final Commentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…But opinions on this subject are not uniform, and in [182], it was even stated that this monoblock concept is not true. Statements have been presented in the literature that it is a material that legitimately competes with gutta-percha and even surpasses it; e.g., it has better adhesion to the surface of the prepared root canal [183,184]. Simultaneously, in the presence of chloroform, a distinct advantage is held by gutta-percha [185], and the opposite in the case of hydration or dampness of the root canal [186].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In several studies [223,230,231], it was found out that the material with a matrix of polyester materials is not better than gutta-percha. Finally, in the works [168,178,184,194,200,211,215,216,230,[232][233][234][235][236][237][238][239][240][241][242][243][244][245], on the contrary, it is this material that provides the best tightness and reduces the number of gaps. It has also been more effective than mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) [246,247].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Virtual Approach to the Comparative Analysis of Biomaterials Used in Endodontic Treatment

Dobrzańska¹,

Dobrzański²,

Gołombek

et al. 2021

Processes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The importance of endodontics is presented within our own concept of Dentistry Sustainable Development (DSD) consisting of three inseparable elements; i.e., Advanced Interventionist Dentistry 4.0 (AID 4.0), Global Dental Prevention (GDP), and the Dentistry Safety System (DSS) as a polemic, with the hypothesis of the need to abandon interventionist dentistry in favour of the domination of dental prevention. In view of the numerous systemic complications of caries that affect 3−5 billion people globally, endodontic treatment effectively counteracts them. Regardless of this, the prevention of oral diseases should be developed very widely, and in many countries dental care should reach the poorest sections of society. The materials and methods of clinical management in endodontic procedures are characterized. The progress in the field of filling materials and techniques for the development and obturation of root canals is presented. The endodontics market is forecast to reach USD 2.1 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 4.1%. The most widely used and recognized material for filling root canals is gutta-percha, recognized as the “gold standard”. An alternative is a synthetic thermoplastic filler material based on polyester materials, known mainly under the trade name Resilon. There are still sceptical opinions about the need to replace gutta-percha with this synthetic material, and many dentists still believe that this material cannot compete with gutta-percha. The results of studies carried out so far do not allow for the formulation of a substantively and ethically unambiguous view that gutta-percha should be replaced with another material. There is still insufficient clinical evidence to formulate firm opinions in this regard. In essence, materials and technologies used in endodontics do not differ from other groups of materials, which justifies using material engineering methodology for their research. Therefore, a detailed methodological approach is presented to objectify the assessment of endodontic treatment. Theoretical analysis was carried out using the methods of procedural benchmarking and comparative analysis with the use of contextual matrices to virtually optimize the selection of materials, techniques for the development and obturation of root canals, and methods for assessing the effectiveness of filling, which methods are usually used, e.g., in management science, and especially in foresight research as part of knowledge management. The results of these analyses are presented in the form of appropriate context matrices. The full usefulness of the research on the effectiveness and tightness of root canal filling using scanning electron microscopy is indicated. The analysis results are a practical application of the so-called “digital twins” approach concerning the virtual comparative analysis of biomaterials used in endodontic treatment.

show abstract

Section: Summary and Final Commentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Virtual Approach to the Comparative Analysis of Biomaterials Used in Endodontic Treatment

Dobrzańska¹,

Dobrzański²,

Gołombek

et al. 2021

Processes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the long-term success of conservative endodontic treatment depends not only on the efficiency of cleaning, but also on the reliability of root canal lumen obturation. Hermetic obturation of the canal is a basic guarantee for termination of periodontal tissue antigen stimulation, creation of favorable conditions for reparative processes in periapical areas and prophylaxis of re-infection of periodontium in remote periods after completion of treatment [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Many methods and techniques for obturation of root canals, each with their own advantages and limitations, were suggested [10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative clinical and laboratory characteristics of the quality of the filling of root canals using three obturation systems

Shumilovich¹,

Morozov²,

Sushchenko³

et al. 2016

Dent Oral Craniofac Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Universal GuttaFlow System is the first and, up to the present day, only system of cold fluid (plastic) gutta-percha, a unique development of the German company Roeko, a part of the Swiss company Coltene/Whaledent. The material was developed on a base of sealer RoekoSeal that is already well-known to dentists and contains polydimethylsiloxane, which has a property of "reverse capillarity" (sealer fluidity is directly proportional to contraction of volume of space where it is placed). In addition to a sealer, the system contains fragmented gutta-percha (30 pm) and silver microparticles, giving it a number of advantages such as: high fluidity; intracanal expansion during polymerization (0,2%); high biological inertness; automatic mixing system (the material is encapsulated); high antibacterial effect; no need for further condensation. This allows the material to penetrate easily into dentinal tubules providing a reliable three-dimensional obturation of a system of micro and macro canals during treatment of complicated caries in any clinical situation. The the X-ray evaluations, 3D dental tomography evaluations, scanning electron microscopy and planar elements map was used. In addition, all this allows you to position this material as an obturative system, which is unique in the world for endodontic treatment of different groups of teeth guaranteed with the very high quality.

show abstract

“…55 Less dye penetration has been reported with Resilon/Epiphany compared to gutta-percha/AH-plus. 56-61 Another study has shown that both materials provide the same coronal seal whereas Resilon provides the best apical seal. 62 In contrast, another investigation has shown that the coronal sealing ability is the best for Resilon.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resilon: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Lotfi,

Ghasemi,

Rahimi

et al. 2013

Journal of Dental Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dichtigkeit von Wurzelkanalfüllungen mit GuttaFlow® und Resilon™ im Vergleich zur lateralen Kondensation

Cited by 9 publications

References 31 publications

Virtual Approach to the Comparative Analysis of Biomaterials Used in Endodontic Treatment

Virtual Approach to the Comparative Analysis of Biomaterials Used in Endodontic Treatment

Comparative clinical and laboratory characteristics of the quality of the filling of root canals using three obturation systems

Resilon: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About