DICOM segmentation and STL creation for 3D Printing: A Process and Software Package Comparison for Osseous Anatomy

Abstract

Background: Extracting and three-dimensional (3D) printing an organ in a region of interest in DICOM images typically calls for segmentation in support of 3D printing as a first step. The DICOM images are not exported to STL data immediately, segmentation masks are exported to STL models. After primary and secondary processing, including noise removal and hole correction, the STL data can be 3D printed. The quality of the 3D model is directly related to the quality of the STL data. This study focuses and reports on DICOM to STL segmentation performance for nine software packages.Methods: Multi-detector row CT scanning was performed on a dry human mandible with two 10-mmdiameter bearing balls as a phantom. The DICOM images file was then segmented and exported to a STL file using nine different commercial/open-source software packages. Once the STL models were created, the data (file) properties and the size and volume of each were measured and differences across the software packages were noted. Additionally, to evaluate differences between the shapes of the STL models by software package, each pair of STL models was superimposed, with observed differences between their shapes characterized as shape error.Results: The data (file) size of the STL file and the number of triangles that constitute each STL model were different across all software packages, there was no statistically significant difference were found across software packages. The created ball STL model expanded in the X-, Y-, and Z-axis directions, with the length in the Z-axis direction (body axis direction) being slightly longer than other directions. There were no significant differences in shape error across software packages for the mandible STL model. Conclusions:The different characteristics of each software package were noticeable, such as different effects in the thin cortical bone area, likely due to the partial volume effect, which may reflect differences in image binarization algorithms. Although the shape of the STL model differs slightly depending on the software, our results indicate that shape error in 3D printing for clinical use in the operation of osseous structures. BackgroundDigital Imaging and COmmunications in Medicine (DICOM) is the leading standard around the world Author informationAffiliations

Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printing in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Problems and Solutions

“…There are no correct CT scanning parameters, STL model creation parameters, or 3D printing parameters for fabricating 3D models. Therefore, the protocol adopted in this report follows our previous reports [6,14] and the report by Mitsouras et al [15]. A slight dimensional error occurred between the master STL model and the STL model due to the amount of laminating pitch, but all were within plus or minus 0.5 mm.…”

Simulated Surgical Model Design for Myringotomy and Tympanostomy Tube Insertion in Children using Medical Image Processing and 3D-Printing Technologies

“…Two-dimensional image data from CT scans were transferred to Materialize Mimics software by uploading DICOM files and selecting the particular tissues. 15,16 Anatomical positions of tympanic membrane, ossicular ligaments, and oval window were captured to ensure that ear canal, tympanic cavity, and middle ear were accurate. 2D image data processing in Mimics software makes it possible to generate three-dimensional models in stereolithography (.stl) file format that can be designed on a computer-aided design software (Pixologic ZBrush).…”

“…2D image data processing in Mimics software makes it possible to generate three-dimensional models in stereolithography (.stl) file format that can be designed on a computer-aided design software (Pixologic ZBrush). [15][16][17] Connective parts between ears and head were designed, and model head circumference was adjusted to match average data from World Health Organization (WHO). Standard ratios of model perimeters as follows; group A: 52 -54 cm, group B: 49 -51 cm and group C: 45 -48 cm.…”

An Easy-to-Use Protocol for Segmenting and 3-D Printing Craniofacial CT-Images Using Open-Source Software

“…Several studies describe the use of online protocols using free software, 5,19 and the conversion of DICOM files (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) into STL (STereoLithography) file format. [19][20][21] Others use expensive software that require a subscription or do not include the printing process in the protocol. 20 However, these protocols are often incomplete and do not provide the necessary level of customization and detail in order to print complex anatomic models.…”

“…[19][20][21] Others use expensive software that require a subscription or do not include the printing process in the protocol. 20 However, these protocols are often incomplete and do not provide the necessary level of customization and detail in order to print complex anatomic models. None of them provide comprehensive step-by-step instructions that would allow an inexperienced user to convert a CT scan image (DICOM file) into a printed 3D model.…”