2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Did decades of glyphosate use have selected for resistant amphibians in agricultural habitats?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously reported that AMPA exposure in tadpoles from the present study, increased deformity rate in individuals originating from AMPA-free forest and increased development length in AMPA-exposed individuals originating from agricultural sites (Tartu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Effects Of Agrochemicals According To Gut Microbiota Composi...supporting
confidence: 61%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We have previously reported that AMPA exposure in tadpoles from the present study, increased deformity rate in individuals originating from AMPA-free forest and increased development length in AMPA-exposed individuals originating from agricultural sites (Tartu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Effects Of Agrochemicals According To Gut Microbiota Composi...supporting
confidence: 61%
“…One may hypothesize that those females in better body condition originate from habitats preserved from AMPA exposition (i.e. forest sites, see Tartu et al (2022)), and that their gut bacterial composition would be more sensitive to AMPA-exposure, however maternal body-condition was not related to habitat (agricultural vs. forested, LME estimate: -2.31 ± 3.69, p = 0.538). The observed relationships underline the dependence of the gut microbiome on interactions among other deterministic factors that were not accounted for in this study, such as host genetic and epigenetic background, age, diet or other environmental stressors (Chen et al, 2022; Shu et al, 2019; Song et al, 2021; Zhou et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations