2015
DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2014.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Did I Miss That: Subtle and Commonly Missed Findings on Chest Radiographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of false or inaccurate information decreases the diagnostic accuracy of radiologists when interpreting chest radiographs in humans. 12,14,39 The same results were replicated in a CT study, where the addition of false historical information decreased the accuracy of the radiological diagnosis; conversely, when the clinical information was accurate, the radiological diagnosis improved. 40 Further research has also raised concerns about the significant increase in false positives when radiologists are instructed to only look for specific abnormalities (eg, pulmonary nodules).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The addition of false or inaccurate information decreases the diagnostic accuracy of radiologists when interpreting chest radiographs in humans. 12,14,39 The same results were replicated in a CT study, where the addition of false historical information decreased the accuracy of the radiological diagnosis; conversely, when the clinical information was accurate, the radiological diagnosis improved. 40 Further research has also raised concerns about the significant increase in false positives when radiologists are instructed to only look for specific abnormalities (eg, pulmonary nodules).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…5,6 With an increase in the population and the number of radiological examinations performed each year, the relative number of qualified radiologists is declining, resulting in backlogs and delays in timely medical imaging even in large organisations like the UK-National Health Service and the US-Department of Veterans Affairs. [7][8][9] Consequent to the increase in the volume of scans, and a decrease in the number of radiologists, are the issues of increasing radiologist burn-out and high interpretation errors. Therefore, having in place a system which can automate the task of quantification on chest radiograph will imply one less thing for the radiologist to worry about while ensuring that this important parameter is not skipped over from radiology reports to conserve time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a busy practice, radiologists may be asked to interpret hundreds of CXRs every day. The high volume of examinations causes delays in result reporting, and fatigue that increases the risk of missing subtle findings 4–6 . Automated tools that can help in triaging examinations and in highlighting regions of abnormality within these examinations can help improve the timeliness and accuracy of the CXR reports 7–9 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high volume of examinations causes delays in result reporting, and fatigue that increases the risk of missing subtle findings. [4][5][6] Automated tools that can help in triaging examinations and in highlighting regions of abnormality within these examinations can help improve the timeliness and accuracy of the CXR reports. [7][8][9] Pneumonia usually manifests as one or more areas of increased opacity on a CXR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%