2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Did the giant extinct shark Carcharocles megalodon target small prey? Bite marks on marine mammal remains from the late Miocene of Peru

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
79
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
79
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence of predation on cetaceans by Carcharocles spp. (Purdy et al, 2001;Aguilera et al, 2008;Collareta et al, 2017;Godfrey et al, 2018;Kent, 2018) and the conspicuous increase of body size in cetaceans since the Oligocene (Pyenson and Sponberg, 2011;Slater et al, 2011Slater et al, , 2017 supports the idea of an evolutionary driver for the overall shift in tooth functional morphology from Otodus obliquus to Carcharocles megalodon. However, the reduced and rounded lateral cusplets of C. chubutensis would likely not have functioned for either grasping or filling of a tooth gap, which makes it difficult to evoke an evolutionary driver for the loss of lateral cusplets from C. chubutensis to C. megalodon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence of predation on cetaceans by Carcharocles spp. (Purdy et al, 2001;Aguilera et al, 2008;Collareta et al, 2017;Godfrey et al, 2018;Kent, 2018) and the conspicuous increase of body size in cetaceans since the Oligocene (Pyenson and Sponberg, 2011;Slater et al, 2011Slater et al, , 2017 supports the idea of an evolutionary driver for the overall shift in tooth functional morphology from Otodus obliquus to Carcharocles megalodon. However, the reduced and rounded lateral cusplets of C. chubutensis would likely not have functioned for either grasping or filling of a tooth gap, which makes it difficult to evoke an evolutionary driver for the loss of lateral cusplets from C. chubutensis to C. megalodon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Cetaceans also exhibit an increase in body size beginning in the Oligocene (Pyenson and Sponberg, 2011;Slater et al, 2011), coincident with the apparent increase in Carcharocles tooth size. A number of studies have documented evidence of predation on cetaceans by Carcharocles megalodon (Deméré and Cerutti, 1982;Purdy et al, 2001;Renz, 2002;Godfrey and Altman, 2005;Aguilera et al, 2008;Kallal et al, 2010;Collareta et al, 2017;Godfrey et al, 2018;Kent, 2018), which leaves little doubt that the development of tooth morphology in the Carcharocles lineage is closely tied to the evolution of cetaceans, but this does not fully explain the role of lateral cusplets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thought that the increased productivity, patchiness and prey densities that resulted from Plio-Pliestocene ocean dynamics provided mysticetes with an evolutionary pathway towards greater body sizes (Slater et al, 2017). Interestingly, a large raptorial shark predator, Carcharocles megalodon, apparently went extinct at this same climatic transition in deep time (Collareta et al, 2017;Pimiento and Clements, 2014), which may have provided release from predation and further facilitated gigantism in mysticetes. Alternatively, resistance to predation could have been a driver for larger body sizes in baleen whales.…”
Section: Potential Drivers Of Gigantism In Baleen Whalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Sr-isotope analyses yielded an age of ca. 7.30 Ma for the MTM vertebrate level, whereas the AGL vertebrate level was younger than 7.46 Ma, which in turn represents the estimated age of the beds just above the ELJ vertebrate level (Ehret et al, 2012) (see also Lambert and de Muizon (2013), Collareta et al (2017a), and Lambert et al (2017) for a discussion about the chronostratigraphic framework of the Pisco Formation cropping out in the Aguada de Lomas valley). Therefore, embracing these recent age estimates, and accounting also for the rather wide confidence intervals associated with the strontium-ratio analyses on shells provided by Ehret et al (2012), it appears that MUSM 888 should be latest Tortonian or early to mid-Messinian in age.…”
Section: Geographical and Stratigraphical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%