1924
DOI: 10.1007/bf01247277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die gattung rhynchoscolex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These electron microscopical findings parallel the conflicting light histological observations about the basement membrane in the Catenulida (e.g. well developed basement membrane in Stenostomum virginianum, see Pullen 1957, and lack of basement membrane in Rynchoscolex, see Reisinger 1924). In all cases studied so far (with the possible exception of Stenostomum virginianum) the intercellular matrix at the base of the epithelium if present -is extremely weakly developed.…”
Section: Body Wallsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…These electron microscopical findings parallel the conflicting light histological observations about the basement membrane in the Catenulida (e.g. well developed basement membrane in Stenostomum virginianum, see Pullen 1957, and lack of basement membrane in Rynchoscolex, see Reisinger 1924). In all cases studied so far (with the possible exception of Stenostomum virginianum) the intercellular matrix at the base of the epithelium if present -is extremely weakly developed.…”
Section: Body Wallsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…There is no indication of an ectodermal infolding or of even transient cilia to reflect Beklemishev's (1969) view of statocyst evolution although this does not in itself rule out an ectodermal origin for the statocyst. Except for the statocyst of Rhynchoscolex, which Reisinger (1924) reports to originate from an epidermal infolding, possibly all turbellarian statocysts develop after the nervous system Anlage has formed and without any connection with the external surface. Despite the absence of cilia, the capsule of the statocyst of C. psammophila could indicate an epithelial origin if it were interpreted as an epithelial basal lamina, but other epithelia of the Acoela lack such a lamina (Ehlers, 1985b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as statocyst development is concerned, the only report tracing the embryonic origin of the statocyst is that of Reisinger (1924) who interprets an introflection of the dorsal epithelium in Rhynchoscolex as the statocyst 'Anlage'. In all other instances, despite Beklemishev's (1969) statement that 'almost all Acoela and several other lower turbellarians have a statocyst sunk in the parenchyma, which has lost its connection with the epidermis', the statocysts do not show epithelial origins and are likely to be derived from a nervous-tissue primordium.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only points worthy of note here are that their early development looks similar to polyclads and, although most of them hatch as a juvenile, a so-called Luther's larva has been described for Rhynchoscolex simplex (Reisinger 1924 ). The signifi cance of the existence of this larval stage within Platyhelminthes will be discussed later.…”
Section: Catenulidamentioning
confidence: 93%