Die Gerichtsorganisation Israels im deuteronomischen Gesetz

Gertz, Jan Christian

doi:10.13109/9783666538476

Cited by 19 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Kilchör dismisses the argument (see Gertz 1994) that Deuteronomy 25 is older than Numbers 27 for three reasons. First, while levirate marriage is not envisioned in Numbers 27, both this text and Deuteronomy 25 explicitly have the preservation of the childless (more properly, sonless) father in view-though it is true that Numbers 27 does provide for an entirely childless man (his inheritance should go to his brothers).…”

Section: Benjamin Kilchörmentioning

confidence: 99%

Case Studies in Recent Research on the Book of Numbers (with Attention to Non-Western Scholarship)

Modine¹

2020

Currents in Biblical Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scholarship on the book of Numbers continues apace, even if there is not a famous commentary that everyone must always cite. Numbers figures especially prominently in recent work on Pentateuchal source criticism. This survey will examine several recent offerings that contribute in various ways to the ongoing discussion. In addition, particular texts within Numbers continue to excite attention, both from historical-critical and postmodern perspectives. Therefore, this article will devote attention to three texts that have drawn particular attention in the past 15 years: the sotah ritual in Numbers 5, Phinehas’s killing of an Israelite man and a Moabite woman in Numbers 25, and the inheritance request of the daughters of Zelophehad in Numbers 27 and 36. In all of these areas, recent offerings from non-Western scholars will receive particular attention.

show abstract

Section: Benjamin Kilchörmentioning

confidence: 99%

Case Studies in Recent Research on the Book of Numbers (with Attention to Non-Western Scholarship)

Modine¹

2020

Currents in Biblical Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…21.18-21 as a manual 15. McKane 1970: 388;Gertz 1994: 182. An opposing view is that of Bellefontaine (1979: 22-23), who wants to maintain 'that the legal account in DeUl.…”

Section: Exegesismentioning

confidence: 99%

Guarding the Parents' Honour—Deuteronomy 21.18-21

Hagedorn

2000

Journal for the Study of the Old Testament

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article argues that Deut. 21.18-21 does not represent an actual law that provides the parents with some guidelines how to proceed with an unruly son. Rather the law aims at guarding the honour of the family. With the help of insights from cultural anthropology it is argued that the law has been constructed to prevent parents abstaining from their duties of raising children and to show them what is at risk if they do, namely the scarce commodity of family honour, a standing in society that can be displayed by having a wise son that listens to his father's discipline. With such an approach it is possible to move beyond the prima facie meaning of the law, allowing its cultural background to be understood more fully.

show abstract

Judges, early Israelite

Wells¹

2012

The Encyclopedia of Ancient History

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Die Gerichtsorganisation Israels im deuteronomischen Gesetz

Cited by 19 publications

References 0 publications

Case Studies in Recent Research on the Book of Numbers (with Attention to Non-Western Scholarship)

Case Studies in Recent Research on the Book of Numbers (with Attention to Non-Western Scholarship)

Guarding the Parents' Honour—Deuteronomy 21.18-21

Judges, early Israelite

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About