1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.1988.tb00057.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die Wirkung von Fumarsäure und Propandiol‐Formiat in der Ferkelaufzucht

Abstract: Zusammenfassung In einem Versuch an Absetzferkeln wurden Futterzusätze von 0,5 (F 1) und 1,5% Fumarsäure (F 2) sowie 0,4 (PF 1) und 1,3 % Propandiol‐Formiat (PF 2) vergleichend zu einer Kontrolle geprüft. Das für alle Tiere gleiche Ferkelaufzuchtfutter enthielt keine Antibiotika bzw. Ergotropika. In obiger Reihenfolge lagen die Zunahmen bei 347, 348, 326, 328 und 312 g/Tier und Tag. In der Magendigesta waren 16, 14, 21, 15 und 37 mmol organische Säuren/100 g Trockensubstanzgehalt enthalten. Ursächlich für die … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses for dry matter were conducted according to AO AC (1990). The buffering capacity of the diets was measured according to Bolduan et al (1988). Crude protein content was analyzed using a Leco Nitrogen-Analyzer and the energy content was determined with the aid of an Adiabatic Bomb Calorimeter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses for dry matter were conducted according to AO AC (1990). The buffering capacity of the diets was measured according to Bolduan et al (1988). Crude protein content was analyzed using a Leco Nitrogen-Analyzer and the energy content was determined with the aid of an Adiabatic Bomb Calorimeter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each treatment diet was separately collected and stored at 4 • C. Accurately weighed 10 g dietary samples were dissolved in 90 mL pure water, then placed them in a constanttemperature shaker at 25 • C for 2 h. After that, the pH value of each sample was measured with a precision pH meter (Mettler Toledo Inc., Shanghai, China). The acid-binding capacity of each treatment diet was measured according to Bolduan et al [16]. Concisely, 100 g of the dietary samples was weighed and dissolved in 200 mL pure water, heated to 37 • C in a constant-temperature water bath, then titrated with 1 mol/L hydrochloric acid until pH = 4.…”
Section: Dietary Ph Value and Acid-binding Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feed acid-binding capacity was determined by the recommended method described by Bolduan (Bolduan, Jung, Schneider, Block, & Klenke, 1988). A total of 100 g feed was weighed and put into a beaker.…”
Section: Ta B L Ementioning
confidence: 99%