Aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic (AAP) bacteria are photoheterotrophic prokaryotes that use light as a secondary energy source to complement the consumption of organic matter. Despite this metabolic flexibility and their widespread distribution, their low relative abundances suggest that they may be subjected to strong regulatory processes. However, there is still little information on the regulation of AAP abundance, particularly in freshwaters. Here, we used a lake mesocosm experiment to address the top-down regulation of freshwater AAP by protists and zooplankton under 2 contrasting nutrient regimes. Our results support the hypothesis that freshwater AAP are subject to intense top-down regulation, and are selectively removed by grazers. The average gross growth rate of AAP was ca. 1.5 times higher, and grazing loss rates 1.6 times higher than those of the bulk bacterial community. Our results further indicate that whereas protists are the main predators of AAP, zooplankton may account for over a third of AAP losses, and both exhibit a greater selectivity for AAP relative to total bacteria. The mechanistic underpinning of this selectivity is still unclear, but it may be related to the average larger cell size of AAP, and to their higher potential growth rates relative to the bulk bacterial community. Our results further suggest that AAP may play a disproportionate role in the nutrition of lake zooplankton, and in the trophic transfer of organic carbon in lake food webs.KEY WORDS: Aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria · Grazing loss rate · Selective predation · Photoheterotrophy · Freshwater
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher
FREE REE ACCESS CCESSContribution to AME Special 5 'SAME 13: progress and perspectives in aquatic microbial ecology ' Aquat Microb Ecol 76: 71-83, 2015 Lamy et al. , Mašín et al. 2012, Fauteux et al. 2015. Two possible hypotheses may explain their low in situ abundances: either light-derived energy has little effect on the growth and competitiveness of AAP, or, if there is an effect, there are other factors, unrelated to phototrophy, that may limit the ecological success of AAP bacteria more than that of other bacterial groups. Experimental evidence from marine environments suggests that AAP bacteria may have higher growth rates than the average bacteria (Koblízek et al. 2007, and therefore their generally low abundance should be due to high losses, either via grazing or viral infection. Indeed, the only study so far to have explored the different controls of the abundance of this group showed that protist grazing was the main regulator of the abundance of marine AAP bacteria . Beyond this marine study, however, there is still little information on the regulation of AAP abundance and activity, especially for inland waters, despite the fact that these photoheterotrophic mic robes have also been shown to be widespread in freshwater planktonic food webs (Mašín et al. 2008, Medová et al. 2011, Mašín et al. 2012, Cuperová et al. 2013,...