2000
DOI: 10.1007/s002890050007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dielectric behavior during sol-gel transition of PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymer aqueous solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have attributed the gelation of Pluronic to the dehydration of PPO groups in the micelle core, a change in the micellar volume, or a decrease in the critical micelle concentration and an increase in the aggregation number. [34][35][36] The effect of Aerosil concentration on sol-gel and gel-sol transition is shown in Figure 4. The incorporation of Aerosil shifted the sol-gel transition to a lower temperature but increased the gel-sol transition temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have attributed the gelation of Pluronic to the dehydration of PPO groups in the micelle core, a change in the micellar volume, or a decrease in the critical micelle concentration and an increase in the aggregation number. [34][35][36] The effect of Aerosil concentration on sol-gel and gel-sol transition is shown in Figure 4. The incorporation of Aerosil shifted the sol-gel transition to a lower temperature but increased the gel-sol transition temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physically, gel formation is related to micellar packing and volume fraction. Researchers have attributed gelation to the dehydration of PPO groups in the micelle core, 32 a change in the micellar volume, 33 or a decrease in the critical micelle concentration and an increase in the aggregation number. 34 The finding that tetracycline lowered the gelation temperature was similar to the result reported by Esposito et al 35 This feature was tentatively explained by a facilitation of the interaction between the hydrophobic portion of the polymer molecules, which could disrupt the micellar structure and increase the entanglement of micelles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This forces the quick dehydration of the system and water is released out of the hydrogel with a large gain in entropy, resulting in shrinkage of the polymeric structure (Kopecek, 2003;Ruel-Gariepy & Leroux 2004). The mostly studied temperature responsive hydrogels are methylcellulose (Stabenfeldt et al 2006), hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (Vinatier et al, 2005), chitosan (Zan et al, 2006), Nisopropylacrylamide (NIPAAm) based copolymers (Lu et al, 2000;Kim et al, 2002;Schmaljohann, 2005;Lee et al, 2006;Qiao et al, 2006) and other N-alkylacrylamide polymers (Hirokawa & Tanaka, 1984), poly(vinyl methyl ether) (PVME) (Kabra et al, 1992;Arndt, Schmidt et al 2001;Theiss et al 2004), poly(N-vinylisobutyramide) (PNVIBA) (Akashi et al, 1996;Kunugi et al, 1997;, poly(ethylene oxide-bpropylene oxide-b-ethylene oxide) (PEO-PPO-PEO) (Bohorquez et al, 1999;Song, Lee et al, 2000), and poly(ethylene oxide)/(D,L-lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) (PEO-PLLA-PLGA) (Jeong et al, 1997) copolymers. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm) is the most popular temperature-responsive polymer since it exhibits a sharp phase transition in water at 34.3 o C which is close to physiological temperature .…”
Section: Temperature Responsive Hydrogelsmentioning
confidence: 99%